Objective

2

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of chronic liver failure（CLF）.

Method

2

Several databases was searched from the establishment date of these databases to January， 2023， including China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）， WanFang Data Knowledge Service Platform（WanFang）， China Biomedical Literature Database（CBM）， VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database（VIP）， Cochrane Library， Embase and PubMed. The randomized controlled trial（RCT） conforming to the treatment of CLF with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine were screened and included， the control group was treated with basic western medicine， and the test group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine on the basis of western medicine. Then， the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature， and Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

Result

2

Eleven literatures with a total of 1 110 patients were included， and Meta analysis showed that the integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine was better than western medicine alone in the treatment of patients with CLF in improving the overall effective rate［relative risk（RR）=1.36， 95% confidence interval（CI） （1.27， 1.46），

P

<

0.000 01］， reducing the mortality［RR=0.35， 95% CI（0.23， 0.53），

P

<

0.000 01）］， reducing alanine aminotransferase（ALT） level［mean difference（MD）=-38.73， 95% CI（-54.59， -22.87），

P

<

0.000 01］， reducing the aspartate aminotransferase（AST） level［MD=-58.16， 95% CI（-83.45， -32.79），

P

<

0.000 01］ and reducing the total bilirubin（TBil） level［MD=-69.21， 95% CI（-94.15， -30.53），

P

<

0.000 01］， promoting serum albumin（ALB） level［MD=3.24， 95% CI（0.82， 5.66），

P

=0.009］ and prothrombin activity（PTA） level［MD=5.44， 95% CI（3.38， 7.50），

P

<

0.000 01］， and improving the traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） symptom score［MD=-4.28， 95% CI（-8.39， -0.17），

P

=0.04］.

Conclusion

2

The treatment of CLF with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine has good clinical efficacy and safety. However， due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of the included literature， the above conclusions still need to be verified by larger scale of high-quality RCT， which is worthy of further expansion of the study.