浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.安徽中医药大学,合肥 230012
2.安徽中医药大学 第一附属医院,合肥 230031
3.安徽省教育厅重点实验室 中医药防治肺系重大疾病重点实验室,合肥 230031
4.合肥综合性国家科学中心 大健康研究院 新安医学与中医药现代化研究所,合肥 230012
Received:28 March 2023,
Published Online:11 July 2023,
Published:05 September 2023
移动端阅览
周童,张西安,田玉丽等.重连口服液治疗新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床疗效[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(17):142-149.
ZHOU Tong,ZHANG Xi'an,TIAN Yuli,et al.Clinical Efficacy of Chonglian Oral Liquid on COVID-19 Patients[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(17):142-149.
周童,张西安,田玉丽等.重连口服液治疗新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床疗效[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(17):142-149. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240295.
ZHOU Tong,ZHANG Xi'an,TIAN Yuli,et al.Clinical Efficacy of Chonglian Oral Liquid on COVID-19 Patients[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(17):142-149. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240295.
目的
2
观察重连口服液对轻型及中型新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者炎症免疫指标及病情转归的影响,综合评价其有效性及安全性。
方法
2
采用随机对照临床研究方法,收取轻型/中型确诊患者120例,对其进行随机分组,最终观察组55例,对照组56例。根据新版诊疗方案,给予对照组西医基础治疗,观察组在西医基础治疗上加服重连口服液,两组均连续治疗10 d,比较观察两组患者中医证候积分、证候疗效、退热时间、核酸转阴时间、炎症免疫指标、影像学疗效改善情况、转归及不良事件发生情况。
结果
2
与本组治疗前比较,两组患者中医证候积分均显著降低(
P
<
0.01),与对照组治疗后比较,观察组患者咳嗽、咽干、咽痛、乏力和肌肉酸痛的改善更为明显(
P
<
0.05)。观察组患者总有效率为100%(55/55),对照组患者总有效率为98.21%(55/56),观察组患者总有效率显著高于对照组(
Z
=3.707,
P
<
0.01)。与对照组治疗后比较,观察组患者退热及核酸转阴时间明显缩短(
P
<
0.05)。与本组治疗前比较,两组患者淋巴细胞计数(LYM)、淋巴细胞百分比(LYM%)、成熟T淋巴细胞(CD3
+
)、辅助/诱导性T淋巴细胞(CD4
+
)水平显著升高(
P
<
0.01);与对照组治疗后比较,观察组改善更明显(
P
<
0.05)。与本组治疗前比较,两组患者的炎症指标均显著降低(
P
<
0.01);与对照组治疗后比较,观察组超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)水平明显降低(
P
<
0.05)。两组影像学疗效评价及转归差异无统计学意义;治疗期间两组均未发生不良反应事件。
结论
2
重连口服液联合西医治疗可显著改善轻、中型新型冠状病毒感染患者临床症状,缩短退热和核酸转阴时间,调节患者免疫功能,抑制炎症反应,从而提高临床疗效。
Objective
2
To observe the effect of Chonglian oral liquid on inflammatory and immune markers as well as the clinical outcomes of patients with mild-to-moderate corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19) and comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and safety.
Method
2
A clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted, involving 120 confirmed cases of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 55 cases in the observation group and 56 cases in the control group. According to the updated diagnosis and treatment protocol, the control group received standard western medical treatment, while the observation group received Chonglian oral liquid in addition to standard western medical treatment. Both groups were treated continuously for 10 days. The traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome scores, syndrome efficacy, fever abatement time, nucleic acid negative conversion time, inflammatory and immune markers, improvement in imaging findings, clinical outcomes, and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.
Result
2
Both groups showed a significant decrease in TCM syndrome scores after treatment (
P
<
0.01). Compared with the control group after treatment, the observation group exhibited a more significant improvement in cough, dry throat, sore throat, fatigue, and muscle pain (
P
<
0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 100% (55/55), significantly higher than 98.21% (55/56) in the control group (
Z
=3.707,
P
<
0.01). The observation group also showed a significantly shorter duration of fever abatement and nucleic acid negative conversion compared with the control group after treatment (
P
<
0.05). Both groups had a significant increase in lymphocyte count (LYM), lymphocyte percentage (LYM%), mature T lymphocytes (CD3
+
), and helper/inducer T lymphocytes (CD4
+
) after treatment (
P
<
0.01). Compared with the control group after treatment, the observation group showed greater improvement in these markers (
P
<
0.05). In terms of inflammatory markers, both groups had a significant decrease compared with those before treatment (
P
<
0.01). The observation group exhibited lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) than the control group after treatment (
P
<
0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in imaging efficacy evaluation and clinical outcomes between the two groups. No adverse events were reported in either group during the treatment period.
Conclusion
2
Chonglian oral liquid combined with standard western medical treatment significantly improves clinical symptoms, shortens fever abatement and nucleic acid negative conversion time, regulates immune function, and inhibits inflammatory responses in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, leading to improved clinical efficacy.
ZHOU P , YANG X L , WANG X G , et al . A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin [J]. Nature , 2020 , 579 ( 7798 ): 270 - 273 .
MEO S A , MEO A S , AL-JASSIR F F , et al . Omicron SARS-CoV-2 new variant:Global prevalence and biological and clinical characteristics [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci , 2021 , 25 ( 24 ): 8012 - 8018 .
吕明圣 , 王洪武 , 班承钧 , 等 . 2022年冬季京冀鲁地区196例新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株感染者临床表现及中医证候分析 [J]. 北京中医药大学学报 , 2023 , 46 ( 5 ): 644 - 650 .
COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel . Coronavirus Disease 2019(guidelinesCOVID-19)treatment.National Institutes of Health[EB/OL].( 2023-01-30 )[ 2023-02-18 ]. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/ .
张军 , 舒婷婷 , 罗卫东 , 等 . 中药早期干预对新型冠状病毒肺炎重症患者疾病转归影响的回顾性临床研究 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2021 , 62 ( 12 ): 1046 - 1051 .
王晶亚 , 李慧珍 , 郭玉娜 , 等 . 清肺排毒汤联合西医常规疗法治疗老年新型冠状病毒肺炎157例临床疗效回顾性研究 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2021 , 62 ( 20 ): 1788 - 1794 .
董莉莉 , 张国梁 , 刁连硕 , 等 . 中西医结合治疗甲型H1N1流感63例 [J]. 安徽中医学院学报 , 2010 , 29 ( 6 ): 27 - 29 .
童佳兵 , 李达 , 杨程 , 等 . 热毒清口服液治疗上呼吸道感染发热临床观察 [J]. 中国中医急症 , 2013 , 22 ( 10 ): 1772 - 1773 .
黄立功 , 肖蓉 , 华光 . 喉咽清口服液联合常规用药治疗普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床疗效及对免疫指标、炎症因子的影响 [J]. 中医临床研究 , 2022 , 14 ( 35 ): 14 - 17 .
王月 , 陈立 , 郑玲 , 等 . 清肺排毒汤联合常规治疗对新冠肺炎患者的临床疗效 [J]. 中成药 , 2021 , 43 ( 3 ): 656 - 659 .
CARLIN J B , DOYLE L W . Sample size [J]. J Paediatr Child Health , 2002 , 38 ( 3 ): 300 - 304 .
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会 . 新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版) [J]. 中国合理用药探索 , 2023 , 20 ( 1 ): 1 - 11 .
郑筱萸 . 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行) [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2002 .
詹志来 , 刘佳 , 杨伟 , 等 . 基于病例分析的中医药治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎疗效评价标准的探索研究 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2020 , 61 ( 12 ): 1013 - 1023 .
中国研究型医院学会感染与炎症放射学专业委员会 , 中国性病艾滋病防治协会感染(传染病)影像工作委员会 , 中华医学会放射学分会传染病学组 , 等 . 新型冠状病毒肺炎影像学辅助诊断指南 [J]. 中国医学影像技术 , 2020 , 36 ( 3 ): 321 - 331 .
罗志辉 , 王昆秀 , 张艳琳 , 等 . 回顾性分析三消饮加减方治疗轻型/普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的临床疗效 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2022 , 28 ( 1 ): 150 - 156 .
李晓凤 , 张少强 , 丛紫东 , 等 . 新型冠状病毒肺炎中医诊断及辨证治疗思考 [J]. 中华中医药学刊 , 2020 , 38 ( 5 ): 21 - 24, 后插4.
赵晨希 , 卢红蓉 . 从伏邪理论探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎的发病特点 [J]. 北京中医药大学学报 , 2023 , 46 ( 1 ): 25 - 31 .
陆曙 , 顾植山 , 陶国水 , 等 . 2019冠状病毒病的中医诊治阶段体会 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2020 , 35 ( 3 ): 1100 - 1103 .
朱建平 , 马小虎 , 田春洪 . 以张震辨治思想为指导的新型冠状病毒感染诊治策略 [J]. 中华中医药学刊 , 2023 , 41 ( 5 ): 14 - 18 .
邓小博 , 马欢欢 , 俞荣 , 等 . 新冠病毒感染后细胞免疫研究进展 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志 , 2022 , 32 ( 10 ): 1590 - 1595 .
WU Y , HUANG X , SUN J , et al . Clinical characteristics and immune injury mechanisms in 71 patients with COVID-19 [J]. mSphere , 2020 , 5 ( 4 ): e00362-20 .
RUAN Q , YANG K , WANG W , et al . Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysisof data of 150 patients from Wuhan,China [J]. Intensive Care Med , 2020 , 46 ( 5 ): 846 - 848 .
王新汝 , 储小毛 , 李泽庚 , 等 . 重连口服液退热机制研究 [J]. 时珍国医国药 , 2022 , 33 ( 6 ): 1336 - 1338 .
苗同艳 , 宫晓飞 , 李春颖 , 等 . 热毒清口服液对老年肺炎大鼠血清中白细胞介素1 β 和肿瘤坏死因子 α 水平的影响 [J]. 中华中医药杂志 , 2016 , 31 ( 2 ): 611 - 613 .
李雪苓 , 韩宁林 , 徐桂琴 , 等 . 重连口服液对内毒素致热新西兰兔解热作用及对血清TNF- α 、IL-1 β 、IL-6表达水平的影响 [J]. 安徽中医药大学学报 , 2014 , 33 ( 5 ): 63 - 65 .
王桂珍 , 韩宁林 , 张宗铭 , 等 . 热毒清口服液对病毒性上呼吸道感染患者T淋巴细胞亚群的影响 [J]. 北京中医药 , 2008 , 27 ( 12 ): 919 - 920 .
韩燕全 , 李泽庚 , 洪燕 , 等 . UPLC法同时测定重连口服液中5种成分的含量 [J]. 中药材 , 2013 , 36 ( 12 ): 2039 - 2041 .
王新汝 , 王小乐 , 李泽庚 , 等 . 基于网络药理学及分子对接探讨重连口服液治疗流行性感冒的作用机制 [J]. 湖南中医杂志 , 2022 , 38 ( 5 ): 147 - 155 .
祁丽丽 , 刘皎霞 , 李永惠 , 等 . 黄芩苷对呼吸道合胞病毒感染的Hep-2细胞凋亡和炎性因子表达的影响 [J]. 中华医院感染学杂志 , 2023 , 33 ( 4 ): 485 - 488 .
苏彦雷 , 刘倩 , 王君平 , 等 . 黄芩素抗奥密克戎毒株BA.2.2活性的研究 [J]. 中华中医药学刊 , 2022 , 40 ( 8 ): 14 - 16,259 .
吴莹 , 金叶智 , 张舒 , 等 . 汉黄芩素对流感病毒感染肺泡巨噬细胞NF- κ B核转位及表达的影响及机制 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2012 , 18 ( 18 ): 161 - 165 .
0
Views
34
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution