

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所,北京 100700
2.甘肃中医药大学 中西医结合学院,兰州 730000
3.中国中医科学院 中医基础理论研究所,北京 100700
Received:02 August 2024,
Published Online:08 October 2024,
Published:20 November 2024
移动端阅览
陈雪,李安,刘芳绮等.基于AGREE-HS评价的应急卫生系统指南主题特点[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2024,30(22):171-177.
CHEN Xue,LI An,LIU Fangqi,et al.Characteristics of Topic for Emergency Health Systems Guidance Based on AGREE-HS[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2024,30(22):171-177.
陈雪,李安,刘芳绮等.基于AGREE-HS评价的应急卫生系统指南主题特点[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2024,30(22):171-177. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20250295.
CHEN Xue,LI An,LIU Fangqi,et al.Characteristics of Topic for Emergency Health Systems Guidance Based on AGREE-HS[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2024,30(22):171-177. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20250295.
应急卫生系统指南(HSG)主题的明确保证了指南内容的针对性、科学性和实用性,为快速、有效的公共卫生响应提供了清晰的方向和框架。该研究采用卫生系统指南研究与评估系统(AGREE-HS)评价工具,对以全球新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)HSG为代表的应急HSG和世界卫生组织(WHO)标准HSG进行了示范性评价,旨在探索应急HSG制定主题的特点。结果显示,纳入的34篇指南中,“主题”条目得分最高。特别是涉及相关且适用因素的标准4得分最高(5.59分),涉及卫生系统优先级别描述的标准3得分最低(2.76分)。标准1在标准HSG和整体应急HSG、WHO与各国应急HSG比较时差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),标准3在标准HSG与应急HSG、WHO与各国应急HSG比较时差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),标准4在WHO与各国应急HSG比较时差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.01);应急HSG亚类评价中,组间、组内比较提示差异无统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。总体而言,应急HSG的主题注重详细描述卫生系统面临的挑战,涵盖挑战的性质、受影响人群等相关且适用的因素,与利益相关方的关注点保持一致;弱化优先级设定,重点在于快速响应和灵活应对紧迫问题。受证据基础、阶段反应时机和有效性等多种因素影响,主题设定有所差异。
The clear definition of the topic in emergency health systems guidance (HSG) ensures the relevance, scientific rigor, and practicality of the guidance, providing a clear direction and a framework for
a rapid and effective public health response. This study used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research
&
Evaluation-Health Systems (AGREE-HS) to demonstratively evaluate the global COVID-19 emergency HSGs and World Health Organization (WHO) standard HSGs, aiming to explore the characteristics of topic in emergency HSGs. The results showed that in the 34 HSGs included, the item topic received the highest score. Specifically, criterion 4 relating to relevant and applicable factors scored the highest (5.59), while criterion 3 concerning the prioritization of health system challenges scored the lowest (2.76). There were differences (
P
<
0.05) in criterion 1 between standard HSGs and overall emergency HSGs, as well as between WHO and national emergency HSGs. Criterion 3 also showed differences (
P
<
0.05) between standard HSGs and emergency HSGs, as well as between WHO and national emergency HSGs. Criterion 4 displayed differences (
P
<
0.000 1) between WHO and national emergency HSGs. No differences were observed in intra-group or inter-group comparisons of different emergency HSG subcategories (
P
<
0.05). Overall, emergency HSGs represented by the COVID-19 emergency HSG focus on detailing the challenges faced by the health system, including the natures of challenges, affected populations, and other relevant and applicable factors, while aligning with stakeholder concerns. The prioritization is downplayed, with emphasis placed on rapid responses to and flexible handling of urgent issues. Influenced by factors such as the evidence base, phase timing, and effectiveness, the topic setting shows variations.
LEWIN S , BOSCH-CAPBLANCH X , OLIVER S , et al . Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems:Assessing how much confidence to place in the research evidence [J]. PLoS Med , 2012 , 9 ( 3 ): e1001187 .
LAVIS J N , RØTTINGEN J A , BOSCH-CAPBLANCH X , et al . Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems:Linking guidance development to policy development [J]. PLoS Med , 2012 , 9 ( 3 ): e1001186 .
AGREE-HS Research Team . The Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation-Health Systems (AGREE-HS) [EB/OL].[ 2023-06-10 ]. http://www.agreetrust.org http://www.agreetrust.org .
郑丹平 , 刘孟宇 , 郭艳 , 等 . 《卫生系统指南研究与评估系统》(AGREE-HS)与中医药标准评价 [J]. 中国中西医结合杂志 , 2021 , 41 ( 5 ): 612 - 615 .
ZHAO Y , WU L . Research on emergency response policy for public health emergencies in China-based on content analysis of policy text and PMC-index model [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health , 2022 , 19 ( 19 ): 12909 .
DESALVO K , HUGHES B , BASSETT M , et al . Public health COVID-19 impact assessment:Lessons learned and compelling needs [J]. NAM Perspect , 2021 , doi: 10.31478/202104c http://dx.doi.org/10.31478/202104c .
CALONGE N , BROWN L , DOWNEY A . Evidence-based practice for public health emergency preparedness and response:Recommendations from a national academies of sciences,engineering,and medicine report [J]. JAMA , 2020 , 324 ( 7 ): 629 - 630 .
FISCHER F , LANGE K , KLOSE K , et al . Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation-A scoping review [J]. Healthcare (Basel) , 2016 , 4 ( 3 ): 36 .
WITTER S , THOMAS S , TOPP S M , et al . Health system resilience:A critical review and reconceptualisation [J]. Lancet Glob Health , 2023 , 11 ( 9 ): e1454 - e1458 .
郑丹平 , 卫东锋 , 史楠楠 , 等 . 基于AGREE-HS工具评价的应急卫生系统指南特点 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2024 , doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240291 http://dx.doi.org/10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240291 .
KWONG J S , CHEN H , SUN X . Development of evidence-based recommendations:Implications for preparing expert consensus statements [J]. Chin Med J (Engl) , 2016 , 129 ( 24 ): 2998 - 3000 .
KHATRI R B , ENDALAMAW A , ERKU D . et al.Preparedness,impacts,and responses of public health emergencies towards health security:Qualitative synthesis of evidence [J]. Arch Public Health , 2023 , 81 ( 1 ): 208 .
HUANG L , CHEN Y , XIAO J , et al . Progress in the research and development of anti-COVID-19 drugs [J]. Front Public Health , 2020 , 8 : 365 .
KAPIRIRI L , ESSUE B , BWIRE G , et al . A framework to support the integration of priority setting in the preparedness,alert,control and evaluation stages of a disease pandemic [J]. Glob Public Health , 2022 , 17 ( 8 ): 1479 - 1491 .
BROUWERS M C , LAVIS J N , SPITHOFF K , et al . Assessment of health systems guidance using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument [J]. Health Policy , 2019 , 123 ( 7 ): 646 - 651 .
TE BRAKE H , WILLEMS A , STEEN C , et al . Appraising evidence-based mental health and psychosocial support(MHPSS) guidelines-Part Ⅰ:A systematic review on methodological quality using AGREE-HS [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health , 2022 , 19 ( 5 ): 3107 .
ZHANG H . Challenges and approaches of the global governance of public health under COVID-19 [J]. Front Public Health , 2021 , 9 : 727214 .
SOUJAA I , NUKPEZAH J A , BENAVIDES A D . Coordination effectiveness during public health emergencies: An institutional collective action framework [J]. Admin Soc , 2021 , 53 ( 7 ): 1014 - 1045 .
BOYCE M R , ASPRILLA M C , VAN LOENEN B , et al . How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities [J]. PLoS Glob Public Health , 2022 , 2 ( 10 ): e0000650 .
ATKINS D , BEST D , BRISS P A , et al . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [J]. BMJ , 2004 , 328 ( 7454 ): 1490 .
靳英辉 , 韩斐 , 王强 , 等 . 临床实践指南制定方法——指南范围、主题及问题的确定 [J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志 , 2018 , 10 ( 3 ): 257 - 261 .
宁允 , 程侣 , 李文姣 , 等 . 患者指南制订方法的思考——患者指南的选题 [J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志 , 2020 , 12 ( 11 ): 1308 - 1310 .
National Academies of Sciences , Engineering , and Medicine ; Health and Medicine Division ; Board on Health Sciences Policy , et al . Future Planning for the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Enterprise: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Proceedings of a Workshop [J]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press(US) , 2022 .
BUCKNER J H , CHOWELL G , SPRINGBORN M R . Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2021 , 118 ( 16 ): e2025786118 .
FILIP R , GHEORGHITA PUSCASELU R , ANCHIDIN-NOROCEL L , et al . Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of pandemic measures and problems [J]. J Pers Med , 2022 , 12 ( 8 ): 1295 .
DESSON Z , WELLER E , MCMEEKIN P , et al . An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France,Belgium,and Canada [J]. Health Policy Technol , 2020 , 9 ( 4 ): 430 - 446 .
HALDANE V , JUNG A S , NEILL R , et al . From response to transformation: How countries can strengthen national pandemic preparedness and response systems [J]. BMJ , 2021 , 375 : e067507 .
HOFMANN B . Biases distorting priority setting [J]. Health Policy , 2020 , 124 ( 1 ): 52 - 60 .
SHADMI E , CHEN Y , DOURADO I , et al . Health equity and COVID-19:Global perspectives [J]. Int J Equity Health , 2020 , 19 ( 1 ): 104 .
郑丹平 , 史楠楠 , 卫东锋 , 等 . 基于AGREE-HS评价的应急卫生系统指南制定方法特点 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2024 , doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240299 http://dx.doi.org/10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240299 .
张格知 , 刘翠芳 , 郑丹平 , 等 . 基于AGREE-HS评价的应急卫生系统指南推荐意见特点 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2024 , doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240292 http://dx.doi.org/10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20240292 .
李安 , 郑丹平 , 张格知 , 等 . 基于AGREE-HS工具的应急卫生系统指南团队组成与协商过程特点 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2024 , doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20250294 http://dx.doi.org/10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20250294 .
0
Views
60
下载量
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621