Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Method of Invigorating Kidney, Dissipating Phlegm and Removing Blood Stasis
|更新时间:2024-01-04
|
Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Method of Invigorating Kidney, Dissipating Phlegm and Removing Blood Stasis
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical FormulaeVol. 18, Issue 24, Pages: 9-13(2012)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
WANG Hui, HAN Tao, GUO Wei, et al. Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Method of Invigorating Kidney, Dissipating Phlegm and Removing Blood Stasis[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2012, 18(24): 9-13.
DOI:
WANG Hui, HAN Tao, GUO Wei, et al. Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Method of Invigorating Kidney, Dissipating Phlegm and Removing Blood Stasis[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2012, 18(24): 9-13.DOI:
Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Vascular Cognitive Impairment by Method of Invigorating Kidney, Dissipating Phlegm and Removing Blood Stasis
Objective:Through screening and analyzing of clinical research literature on vascular cagnitive impairment(VCI)
objectively evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the therapy of invigorating kidney
removing phlegm and blood stasis
to provide clinical evidence of evidence-based medicine. Method: With the method of cochrane systematic review
searching randomized controlled trial(RCT) reports of PubMed
Cochrane
CBM
CNKI
VIP
Wanfang (2001-2011)
collecting the researches met inclusion criteria by two independent evaluators
analyzing data using Revman 5.1. Result: According to the inclusion criteria
screened out 18 articles of RCT qualified reports from 569 of Chinese medicine treatment of VCI
of which 18 reports had relative high quality. The results showed that: ①The therapy of invigorating kidney and removing phlegm and blood stasis had a better efficacy than the control group by mini-mental state examination(MMSE)
BBS(P<0.05);②There was no significant difference shown by ADL;③ There was no statistical significant difference in safety
indicating that the two groups of incidence of adverse reaction no significant differences by Chi-square test. Conclusion: Available evidences manifests: the therapy has a better efficacy and no significant differences in safety. Due to defects of experimental design and selection of the outcome indexes
should have the process of syndrome differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) and make and use unified syndrome curative effect evaluation standard according to syndrome differentiation of TCM
and need to push in more the rational design
the execution strictly
the multi-central and large sample
long time follow-up and has Chinese medicine characteristics double-blind RCT.
Efficacy Evaluation of Dingkundan in Treatment of Female Infertility: A Systematic Review Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
Systematic Evaluation of Pushen Capsule in the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia: A Meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Effect of Xuebijing Injection on Inflammatory Index and Immune Function in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Late Onset Hyponatremia
Meta Analysis on Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine Injection for Cerebral Stroke
Related Author
XU Si-min
HU Rui-xue
DAI Ze-qi
LI Hui-min
SUN Wei-wei
LIAO Xing
Hui-min LI
Rui-xue HU
Related Institution
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Evidence-based Medicine Center,Beijing Institute of TCM
Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine