Chaifang Oral Liquid as Supplementary Treatment for Children with Acute Upper Respiratory Infection
|更新时间:2024-01-04
|
Chaifang Oral Liquid as Supplementary Treatment for Children with Acute Upper Respiratory Infection
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical FormulaeVol. 18, Issue 13, Pages: 266-269(2012)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
WANG Yun, SHAO Shu-fang, LI Hui, et al. Chaifang Oral Liquid as Supplementary Treatment for Children with Acute Upper Respiratory Infection[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2012, 18(13): 266-269.
DOI:
WANG Yun, SHAO Shu-fang, LI Hui, et al. Chaifang Oral Liquid as Supplementary Treatment for Children with Acute Upper Respiratory Infection[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2012, 18(13): 266-269.DOI:
Chaifang Oral Liquid as Supplementary Treatment for Children with Acute Upper Respiratory Infection
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of Chaifang oral liquid in the treatment for children with fever of acute upper respiratory infection(AURI). Method: Sixty-six qualified children with AURl were enrolled in this study and divided randomly into two groups: on the basis of conventional treatment
32 cases were treated with Chaifang oral liquid as Chinese medicine treatment group
34 cases were treated with ribavirin as western medicine controll group. With 3 day course of treatment
patients were observed for changes in temperature
primary clinical symptoms and signs before and after treatment for comparing efficacy. Result: ① Compared the temperature cooling time
the time of Chaifang oral liquid group was (2.8±1.3)days
the time of controlled group was (3.8±1.0)days
there is a statistical difference (P<0.01). The cooling start time (descended 0.5℃ by our standards)
that was (2.0±1.1)days in Chaifang oral liquid group
the time in controlled group was (2.8±1.1)days
there is a statistical difference (P<0.01). ② In Chaifang oral liquid treatment group
the total efficacy of pyrexia extinction was 84.4%. In controll group
the total efficacy of pyrexia extinction was 64.7%
there is a statistical difference within two groups (P<0.05). ③ After treatment
patients were observed changes in clinical symptoms and signs
such as pharyngalgia
cough and stuffy nose
the rates of symptom disappearance in Chaifang oral liquid treatment group were higher than those in the control group
there is a statistical difference (P<0.05) for the cough disappearance rate. Conclusion: Chaifang oral liquid is better than Western medicine for body temperature cooling and it can markedly improve clinical symptoms and signs. It is an effective prescription in the supplementary treatment for children with AURI. Thus
Chaifang oral liquid deserves popularization in clinical practice.