Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods for the Semen Seu Fructus Physalis
|更新时间:2024-09-23
|
Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods for the Semen Seu Fructus Physalis
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical FormulaeVol. 16, Issue 1, Pages: 14-17(2010)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2010
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LI Xiao-lin, SHAO Ai-juan, CHEN Min, et al. Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods for the Semen Seu Fructus Physalis[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2010, 16(1): 14-17.
DOI:
LI Xiao-lin, SHAO Ai-juan, CHEN Min, et al. Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods for the Semen Seu Fructus Physalis[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2010, 16(1): 14-17.DOI:
Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods for the Semen Seu Fructus Physalis
Objective: To compare seven protein extraction protocols(PVP buffer
HEPES buffer
Lysis buffer A extraction and TCA/acetone
tris-base/acetone
phenol/ammonium acetate
acetone/phenol/ammonium acetate precipitation) and establish a suitable one for total proteins extraction from Semen Seu Fructus Physalis. Methods: The protein yield
protein purity and SDS-PAGE patterns was determined and analyzed. Results: HEPES buffer extraction produce the purer sample
much more clear bands and highest resolution. PVP buffer and Lysis buffer A extraction had most impurities. TCA/acetone
tris-base/acetone
phenol/ammonium acetate
acetone/phenol/ ammonium acetate precipitation methods had the purest sample
but protein yield and band numbers were lowest. Besides
the methods employing Lysis buffer was easy to produce high-abundance proteins and interfered in the electrophoresis resolution. Conclusion: HEPES buffer extraction was the best sample preparation protocol for SDS-PAGE and 2-D PAGE.