GUO Xiao-ge, XIAO Zi-zeng, LU Fang-guo, et al. Therapeutic Effect of Maxing Shigan Decoction Proceeded by Two Boilling Methods in Mice Infected with Influenza Avirus[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(21): 227-231.
DOI:
GUO Xiao-ge, XIAO Zi-zeng, LU Fang-guo, et al. Therapeutic Effect of Maxing Shigan Decoction Proceeded by Two Boilling Methods in Mice Infected with Influenza Avirus[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(21): 227-231. DOI: 10.11653/syfj2013210227.
Therapeutic Effect of Maxing Shigan Decoction Proceeded by Two Boilling Methods in Mice Infected with Influenza Avirus
Objective: A comparative study of two boiling method (ephedra first boiling and four herbs with boiling) the proceeds Maxin Shigan decoction of influenza A virus infection in mice. Method: Nasal inoculation method to establish the type A influenza virus lung infection in mice model
experimental set normal comparison group
model comparison group
ephedra first boiling group
four herbs with boiling group
oseltamivir group
7 days of continuous given medicines by intragastric. Respectively
4 days and 7 days after infection to detect the body weigh of mice
on the 7th day
routine testing lung weight index;observation of lungchanges by optical microscopy techniques
lung tissues were observed ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy techniques. Result: ① Body weight:4 days and 7 days after infection
compared with the normalcomparison group
model comparison group significant weight loss(P<0.05)
7 days after therapy
compared with the model comparison group
Oseltamivir group
ephedra first boilinggroup significant weight gain(P<0.01 or P<0.05).② Lung index:compared with the normal comparison group
the mouse lung index of model comparison group increased significantly(P<0.01).Compared with the model comparison group
lung index was significantly reduced in all treatment groups(P<0.01 or P<0.05). The significant difference(P<0.01)about of the ephedra first boiling group compared with the model comparison group is higher than thefour herbs with boiling group compared with the model comparison group on the significance(P<0.05).③Lung pathological changes:compared with the normal comparison group
the mouse lungs normal tissue structure disappeared
the alveolar inflammatory cell infiltration. Compared with the model comparison group
lung tissue of all treatment groups pathological change significantly improvely
among oseltamivir group and ephedra first boiling group
the level of lung disease in mice is lighter than four herbs with boiling group.④ Lung tissue ultrastructure:compared with thenormal comparison group
the mouse lung tissue ultrastructure of model comparison group was damaged
theperformance of the nuclear membrane and the plasma membrane are blurred
reduced organelle
the mitochondrial cristaeis reduce ordisappear
endoplasmic reticulum emerges vacuolar lesions
there are a large number of virus particles in the cytoplasm
each treatment group lung tissue structure has been improved.Among oseltamivir group and ephedra first boiling group
the extent of lung tissue ultrastructure diseasein mice is completer than four herbs with boiling group. Conclusion: The ephedra first boiling decoction is more effective than the four herbs with boilingdecoction on againning type A influenza virus.