Heat Better Oral Liquid from Best Autumn Lee Alcohol,Ketone of Patchouli,Thymol,Sweet Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb Phenol Determination of GC Conditions Optimization
|更新时间:2024-01-04
|
Heat Better Oral Liquid from Best Autumn Lee Alcohol,Ketone of Patchouli,Thymol,Sweet Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb Phenol Determination of GC Conditions Optimization
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical FormulaeVol. 20, Issue 14, Pages: 65-68(2014)
LI Feng-li, GAO Wen-yuan, LI Jin, et al. Heat Better Oral Liquid from Best Autumn Lee Alcohol,Ketone of Patchouli,Thymol,Sweet Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb Phenol Determination of GC Conditions Optimization[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2014, 20(14): 65-68.
DOI:
LI Feng-li, GAO Wen-yuan, LI Jin, et al. Heat Better Oral Liquid from Best Autumn Lee Alcohol,Ketone of Patchouli,Thymol,Sweet Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb Phenol Determination of GC Conditions Optimization[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2014, 20(14): 65-68. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2014140065.
Heat Better Oral Liquid from Best Autumn Lee Alcohol,Ketone of Patchouli,Thymol,Sweet Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb Phenol Determination of GC Conditions Optimization
Objective: Optimization and to establish the heat better oral liquid from best autumn lee alcohol
ketone of patchouli
thymol
sweet fineleaf schizonepeta herb phenol of capillary gas chromatography determination conditions. Method: The chromatographic column:HP-5 (0.25 μm×0.32 mm×30 m)elastic quartz capillary column;injection port temperature 220℃
FID detector temperature 220℃
temperature programmed
starting temperature 110℃
keep for 10 min
at 25℃ to 230℃
temperature programmed to keep 9.2 min
diversion ratio 10:1
including 1 L sample quantity. Result: The autumn lee alcohol
ketone of patchouli
thymol
sweet fineleaf schizonepeta herb phenol concentration in sample quantity is 1.109-0.110 9
0.504-0.050 4
0.987-0.098 7
0.605-0.060 5 g·L-1 and good linear relationship between peak area
linear relationship is Y=1 653.05X-1.46(r=0.999 8)
Y=1 207.45X-16.10(r=0.999 7)
Y=1 691.68X-18.06(r=0.999 5)
Y=1 547.18X+5.55(r=0.999 6)
sample recovery rate was 99.9%-103.7%(n=9)
98.4%-104.4%
104.4%-101.4% and 101.4%-97.2%
RSD was 1.9%
2.3%
2.5% and 1.9% respectively. Conclusion: The optimized method has good separating degree