浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.江西中医药大学 药学院,南昌 330004
2.北京中医药大学 东方学院,河北 廊坊 301739
王蝉,在读硕士,从事中药炮制与质量标准研究,E-mail:790112131@qq.com
龚千锋,教授,博士生导师,从事中药炮制传承、饮片质量标准与炮制机制研究,E-mail:gongqf2002@163.com; *
于欢,副教授,硕士生导师,从事中药饮片标准化与中药炮制机制研究,E-mail:416931863@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2022-09-20,
网络出版日期:2021-11-11,
收稿日期:2021-09-29,
扫 描 看 全 文
王蝉,赵文燕,向茜等.基于HS-GC-MS考察苍术米泔水漂制前后挥发性成分的变化[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(18):127-134.
WANG Chan,ZHAO Wenyan,XIANG Qian,et al.Analysis of Differences of Volatile Components in Atractylodis Rhizoma Before and After Processing with Rice-washed Water by HS-GC-MS[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(18):127-134.
王蝉,赵文燕,向茜等.基于HS-GC-MS考察苍术米泔水漂制前后挥发性成分的变化[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(18):127-134. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20212150.
WANG Chan,ZHAO Wenyan,XIANG Qian,et al.Analysis of Differences of Volatile Components in Atractylodis Rhizoma Before and After Processing with Rice-washed Water by HS-GC-MS[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(18):127-134. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20212150.
目的
2
通过比较苍术经米泔水漂制前后的挥发性成分组成与含量变化,考察米泔水炮制对苍术挥发性成分的影响。
方法
2
采用顶空气相色谱-质谱法(HS-GC-MS)检测北苍术、茅苍术及二者米泔水制品的挥发性成分,色谱条件采用程序升温(起始柱温50 ℃,维持2 min;以10 ℃·min
-1
升温至120 ℃,以2.5 ℃·min
-1
升温至170 ℃,以10 ℃·min
-1
升温至240 ℃,维持3 min),进样口温度280 ℃,分流比为10∶1,溶剂延迟时间3 min;质谱条件为电子轰击离子源(EI),离子源温度230 ℃,扫描范围
m
/
z
20~650,采用峰面积归一化法测定各成分的相对质量分数。运用SIMCA 14.1对所得样品数据进行主成分分析(PCA)及正交偏最小二乘法-判别分析(OPLS-DA),通过变量重要性投影(VIP)值
>
1的原则筛选北苍术、茅苍术与其炮制品的差异性成分。
结果
2
共鉴定出60种化合物,其中北苍术40种、制北苍术38种、茅苍术46种、制茅苍术47种。PCA及OPLS-DA均显示,4种苍术样品各自聚为一类,表明2种苍术经米泔水炮制后挥发性成分均发生明显变化,且北苍术和茅苍术的挥发性成分差异明显。2种苍术的生品与其炮制品比较,化合物组成基本不变,但含量有明显变化,差异性成分主要聚集在单萜类及倍半萜类化合物,且单萜类化合物含量多呈下降趋势。
结论
2
北苍术、茅苍术经米泔水炮制后挥发性成分的含量发生了明显变化,蒎烯、3-蒈烯、4-异丙基甲苯、罗勒烯、萜品油烯、苍术酮、乙酸、糠醛可作为炮制前后的差异性标志物。
Objective
2
By comparing the composition and content changes of the volatile components in Atractylodis Rhizoma before and after processing with rice-washed water, the effect of rice-washed water processing on volatile components in Atractylodis Rhizoma was investigated.
Method
2
Headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) was used to detect the volatile components in rhizomes of
Atractylodes chinensis
and
A. lancea
, and their processed products of rice-washed water. Chromatographic conditions were programmed temperature (starting temperature of 50 ℃ for 2 min, rising to 120 ℃ with the speed of 10 ℃·min
-1
, then rising to 170 ℃ at 2.5 ℃·min
-1
, and rising to 240 ℃ at 10 ℃·min
-1
for 3 min), the inlet temperature was 280 ℃, the split ratio was 10∶1, and the solvent delay time was 3 min. The conditions of mass spectrometry were electron bombardment ionization (EI) with ionization temperature at 230 ℃ and detection range of
m
/
z
20-650. Then the relative content of each component was determined by the peak area normalization method. SIMCA 14.1 software was used to perform unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and supervised orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) on each sample data, the differential components of Atractylodis Rhizoma and its processed products were screened by the principle of variable importance in the projection (VIP) value
>
1.
Result
2
A total of 60 components were identified, among which 40 were rhizomes of
A. chinensis
and 38 were its processed products, 46 were rhizomes of
A. lancea
and 47 were its processed products. PCA and OPLS-DA showed that the 4 kinds of Atractylodis Rhizoma samples were clustered into one category respectively, indicating that the volatile components of the two kinds of Atractylodis Rhizoma were significantly changed after processing with rice-washed water, and there were also significant differences in the volatile components of rhizomes of
A. lancea
and
A. chinensis
. The compound composition of Atractylodis Rhizoma and its processed products was basically the same, but the content of the compounds was significantly different. The differential components were mainly concentrated in monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids, and the content of monoterpenoids mostly showed a decreasing trend.
Conclusion
2
After processing with rice-washed water, the contents of volatile components in rhizomes of
A. lancea
and
A. chinensis
are significantly changed, and pinene, 3-carene,
p
-cymene, ocimene, terpinolene, atractylon, acetic acid and furfural can be used as difference markers before and after processing.
苍术米泔水中药炮制挥发性成分顶空气相色谱-质谱法(HS-GC-MS)萜类主成分分析(PCA)
Atractylodis Rhizomarice-washed watertraditional Chinese medicine processingvolatile componentsheadspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS)terpenoidsprincipal component analysis (PCA)
国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:168-169.
KOONRUNGSESOMBOON N,NA-BANGCHANG K,KARBWANG J.Therapeutic potential and pharmacological activities of Atractylodes lancea (Thunb.) DC[J].Asian Pac J Trop Med,2014,7(6):421-428.
ZHANG W J,ZHAO Z Y,CHANG L K,et al.Atractylodis Rhizoma:A review of its traditional uses,phytochemistry,pharmacology,toxicology and quality control[J].J Ethnopharmacol,2021,266:113415.
鄢连和.米泔水炮制中药的应用分析[J].中国药业,2010,19(10):83-84.
张钰祺,龚千锋.米泔水在中药炮制中的古今应用研究[J].江西中医药,2011,42(4):64-66.
李时珍.本草纲目[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,2014.
王文凯,张正,翁萍,等.建昌帮米泔水漂苍术工艺研究[J].时珍国医国药,2015,26(9):2157-21579.
王文凯,杨梅,张正,等.传统米泔水制备工艺研究[J].江西中医药,2017,48(7):60-62.
王文凯,杨梅,张正.现代米粉制米泔水工艺研究[J].时珍国医国药,2017,28(9):2118-2120.
王文凯,赵玉霞,杨梅.稻米的种类对配制米泔水质量的影响[J].中草药,2018,49(14):3287-3291.
龚鹏飞,于欢,龚千锋,等.效应面法优选建昌帮米泔水漂苍术炮制工艺[J].江西中医药大学学报,2018,30(3):56-59.
曹琰,刘产明,张琪,等.孟河医派苍术特色炮制品与其他炮制品中β-桉叶醇、苍术酮和苍术素含量差异的研究[J].江苏中医药,2018,50(12):68-70.
孟祥龙,郭晓慧,章茜茜,等.苍术炮制前后挥发油成分的分析和比较[J].世界科学技术—中医药现代化,2014,16(8):1760-1767.
赵玉霞.樟帮特色米泔漂苍术工艺及药效学研究[D]南昌:江西中医药大学,2019.
高岩,王知斌,杨春娟,等.GC-MS联用法分析不同产地茅苍术挥发油成分[J].中医药学报,2017,45(3):35-38.
吉力,敖平,潘炯光,等.苍术挥发油的气相色谱-质谱联用分析[J].中国中药杂志,2001,26(3):182-185.
逄健,姜宇珺,马善鹏,等.基于GC-MS法分析比较四种苍术和白术挥发油成分的异同[J].亚太传统医药,2020,16(10):60-66.
曾志,叶雪宁,庞世敏,等.北苍术和茅苍术挥发油成分的比较[J].应用化学,2012,29(4):470-476.
典灵辉,梁勇,宋艳平.苍术挥发油成分GC-MS分析[J].广州化工,2004,32(2):32-34.
钟凌云,于欢,祝婧,等.炮制技术流派——樟树帮药文化探究[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2017,23(2):1-6.
赵佶.圣济总录[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
寇宗奭.本草衍义[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990.
龚千锋.中药炮制学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2005.
朱雄华,蔡忠新,李夏亭.孟河四家医集[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2006.
徐忠,缪铭.淀粉基吸附剂的制备及应用研究进展[J].化学与黏合,2006,28(6):435-439.
刘春莲,瞿领航,涂济源,等.基于中药道地性优势对苍术现行质量标准的思考[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(3):212-219.
南京中医药大学.中药大辞典:上[M].2版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2014.
中国医学院科学院药物研究所,中国科学院南京中山植物园,北京医学院药学系,等.中药志:第1册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1959.
王艺萌,王知斌,孙延平,等.苍术属植物中倍半萜类化合物化学结构和生物活性研究进展[J].中草药,2021,52(1):299-309.
邓爱平,李颖,吴志涛,等.苍术化学成分和药理的研究进展[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(21):3904-3913.
吴佳新.茅苍术挥发油成分及药理活性综述[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(3):28-30.
凡若楠,钟凌云,于武华,等.江西建昌帮阴附片和阳附片对阳虚小鼠棕色脂肪组织的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(14):72-77.
0
浏览量
12
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构