浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.宁夏农林科学院 植物保护研究所,宁夏植物病虫害防治重点实验室,银川 750002
2.宁夏医科大学 药学院,宁夏特色中医药省部共建协同创新中心, 宁夏特色中医药工程技术中心,银川 750004
3.湖南中医药大学 中医学院,长沙 410007
4.百瑞源枸杞股份有限公司,银川 750200
何嘉,硕士,副研究员,从事枸杞植保栽培技术研究,Tel:0951-6882370,E-mail:hejiayc@126.com
王汉卿,博士,教授,从事中药资源开发利用研究,Tel:0951-6980193,E-mail:wwwhhq@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-12-20,
网络出版日期:2023-05-17,
收稿日期:2023-03-11,
扫 描 看 全 文
何嘉,卢有媛,谢明霞等.基于多指标成分比较不同微生物菌剂对枸杞子品质的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(24):177-184.
HE Jia,LU Youyuan,XIE Mingxia,et al.Comparison of Effect of Different Microbial Agents on Quality of Lycii Fructus Based on Multiple Index Components[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(24):177-184.
何嘉,卢有媛,谢明霞等.基于多指标成分比较不同微生物菌剂对枸杞子品质的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(24):177-184. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20230968.
HE Jia,LU Youyuan,XIE Mingxia,et al.Comparison of Effect of Different Microbial Agents on Quality of Lycii Fructus Based on Multiple Index Components[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(24):177-184. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20230968.
目的
2
通过比较配施不同微生物菌剂后枸杞子中多类型化学成分含量差异,揭示微生物菌剂对枸杞子品质的影响。
方法
2
以宁杞7号为实验材料,通过配施培元和新特锐(TP组)、哈茨木霉和枯草芽孢杆菌(BW组)、根无忧(MT组)和菌益多(JYD组)4种微生物菌剂,以不施微生物菌剂为空白组(CK组),采用紫外分光光度法、高效液相色谱法(HPLC)、超高效液相色谱质谱联用法(UHPLC-MS/MS)测定枸杞子中总酚、总黄酮、糖类、氨基酸、核苷和碱基、甜菜碱等成分含量,运用多重比较、主成分分析(PCA)、偏最小二乘法判别分析(PLS-DA)等方法分析微生物菌剂对枸杞子品质的影响。
结果
2
微生物菌剂对枸杞子中不同的化学成分影响不同,总酚含量以TP组最高,与CK组差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);总黄酮含量以BW组最高,TP组次之;多糖和糖醛酸含量均以JYD组最高;与CK组比较,TP组和BW组甜菜碱含量均明显升高(
P
<
0.05);测定的23种氨基酸中,大部分氨基酸在JYD组最低,MT组最高;核苷碱基则在MT组和BW组含量较高。基于测定的45种化学成分可以明显区分不同处理组枸杞子。PLS-DA显示,各处理组主要的差异成分为多糖、葡萄糖、果糖、甜菜碱、糖醛酸、天冬酰胺、蔗糖、苏氨酸、总黄酮、丙氨酸和总酚等。基于主要差异成分的PCA综合评分结果显示,各处理组枸杞子化学成分综合得分为BW组
>
TP组
>
MT组
>
CK组
>
JYD组。
结论
2
配施微生物菌剂BW、TP和MT可以促进枸杞子品质提升,配施JYD在一定程度上促进了多糖和糖醛酸的积累,但对枸杞子品质的整体影响尚不明确。本研究可为枸杞子产业绿色健康发展奠定基础。
Objective
2
To reveal the effects of different microbial agents on quality of Lycii Fructus by comparing the differences in the contents of multiple types of chemical components in Lycii Fructus after the application of different microbial agents.
Method
2
Taking Ningqi No. 7 as experimental material, four microbial agents, namely Peiyuan combined with Xinterui(TP group),
Trichoderma harzianum
combined with
Bacillus subtilis
(BW group), Genwuyou(MT group) and Junyiduo(JYD group), were applied, and no microbial agents was used as the blank group(CK group). Then the contents of total phenolics, total flavonoids, saccharides, amino acids, nucleosides and bases, betaine and other components in Lycii Fructus were determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry(UV), high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry(UHPLC-MS/MS), and the methods such as multiple comparisons, principal component analysis(PCA) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis(PLS-DA) were used to analyze the effect of different microbial agents on the quality of Lycii Fructus.
Result
2
Microbial agents had different effects on chemical components of Lycii Fructus. The content of total phenolics was the highest in the TP group, and it varied significantly from the CK group(
P
<
0.05). The total flavonoid content was the highest in the BW group, followed by the TP group. Both polysaccharide and alduronic acid contents were the highest in the JYD group. Betaine content in the TP and BW groups were significantly higher than that in the CK group(
P
<
0.05). For the determined 23 kinds of amino acids, most of them were the lowest in the JYD group, and the highest in the MT group, while the nucleoside bases were higher in the MT and BW groups. It indicated that Lycii Fructus from different treatment groups could be distinguished clearly based on the determined 45 chemical components. The result of PLS-DA showed that the major differential components in each group were polysaccharides, glucose, fructose, betaine, alduronic acid, asparagine, sucrose, threonine, total flavonoids, alanine and total phenolics. The results of PCA composite scores based on the main differential components showed that composite scores of chemical components in each group were BW group
>
TP group
>
MT group
>
CK group
>
JYD group.
Conclusion
2
The application of microbial agents of BW, TP and MT can promote the quality improvement of Lycii Fructus, and the application of JYD can promote the accumulation of polysaccharides and alduronic acid to a certain extent, but the overall effect on the quality of Lycii Fructus is not clear. This study lays the foundation for the green and healthy development of Lycii Fructus industry.
微生物菌剂枸杞子宁夏枸杞品质评价糖类氨基酸类核苷和碱基
microbial agentsLycii FructusLycium bararumquality evaluationsaccharidesamino acidsnucleoside and nucleobase
赵光跃,魏玉海,苏姗姗,等.基于1H-NMR植物代谢组学技术分析青海产区枸杞子的化学特征[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(17):95-103.
赵佳琛,金艳,闫亚美,等.经典名方中枸杞及地骨皮的本草考证[J].中国现代中药,2020,22(8):1269-1286.
MA Y,WANG Z,LI Y,et al.Fruit morphological and nutritional quality features of goji berry(Lycium barbarum L.)during fruit development[J].Sci Hortic,2023,308:111555.
卢有媛,郭盛,张芳,等.枸杞属药用植物资源系统利用与产业化开发[J].中国现代中药,2019,21(1):29-36.
NA X,MA S,MA C,et al.Lycium barbarum L.(goji berry)monocropping causes microbial diversity loss and induces Fusarium spp.enrichment at distinct soil layers[J].Appl Soil Ecol,2021,doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104107http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104107
NA X,MA S,MA C,et al.Monocropping decouples plant-bacteria interaction and strengthens phytopathogenic fungi colonization in the rhizosphere of a perennial plant species[J].Plant Soil,2019,445:549-564.
马少兰,马彩霞,徐鹏鑫,等.再植枸杞根际真菌群落对长期连作的响应研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(6):1493-1503.
何嘉,王芳,张蓉,等.枸杞病虫害“五步法”绿色防控技术[J].宁夏农林科技,2020,61(4):50-52.
苟春林,张艳.枸杞质量安全现状分析[J].宁夏农林科技,2019,60(9):46-48.
HAFEZ M,POPOV A I,RASHAD M.Integrated use of bio-organic fertilizers for enhancing soil fertility-plant nutrition,germination status and initial growth of corn(Zea Mays L.)[J].Environ Sci Tech Let,2020,doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.101329http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101329
KÖHL J,KOLNAAR R,RAVENSBERG W J.Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases:Relevance beyond efficacy[J].Front Plant Sci,2019,10:845.
王琳,胡凯基,及华,等.微生物菌剂对金银花生长和品质的调控[J].农业环境科学学报,2022,41(12):2817-2823.
胡灵晓,俞春英,江建铭.不同生物菌剂对铁皮石斛生长的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2022,63(8):1712-1714.
杜公福,黄永,黄大野,等.不同微生物菌剂对辣椒疫病防控效果及土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J].热带作物学报,2023,44(6):1214-1223.
李雪晴,时昕彤,韩林成,等.生物菌剂与化学药剂对人参锈腐病菌的联合生物活性增效筛选及防病效果[J].农药,2022,61(12):910-915.
保善存,樊光辉,李发毅.解淀粉芽孢杆菌微生物菌剂对枸杞生长及土壤性状的影响[J/OL].中国土壤与肥料,2022.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5498.S.20220928.1326.005http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5498.S.20220928.1326.005.
闫鹏科,常少刚,孙权,等.施用生物有机肥对枸杞产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019(5):112-118.
吕亮雨,樊光辉,付全,等.生物有机肥对盐碱地土壤及枸杞生理特性、产量品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(3):97-104.
包慧芳,王宁,侯敏,等.生物有机肥对枸杞产量、品质及土壤性状的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2020,57(3):545-552.
MA R H,ZHANG X X,NI Z J,et al.Lycium barbarum (Goji) as functional food: A review of its nutrition,phytochemical structure,biological features,and food industry prospects[J].Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr,2022,20:1-15.
何嘉,马婷慧,白小军,等.不同微生物菌剂对枸杞生长发育及产量品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(6):1296-1301.
何嘉,马婷慧,白小军,等.微生物菌剂对枸杞生长发育、产量品质及土壤养分的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(14):149-154.
LU Y,GUO S,ZHANG F,et al.Comparison of functional components and antioxidant activity of Lycium barbarum L.fruits from different regions in China[J].Molecules,2019,24(12):2228.
国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:260.
李园,常相伟,朱邵晴,等.黄芪花营养成分分析与资源价值评价[J].中草药,2018,49(18):4408-4416.
LU Y,GUO S,ZHANG F,et al.Nutritional components characterization of Goji berries from different regions in China[J].J Pharm Biomed Anal,2021,195:113859.
杨颂,杨利民.微生物菌剂在农业生产上的应用[J].吉林农业,2015(12):86-87.
张明,陈泓志,李明.一种复合微生物菌肥对穿心莲生长、品质及土壤性质的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(4):153-160.
李卓蔚,郎佳琪,孟琦,等.接种解有机磷细菌对滇重楼品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(16):156-164.
吕亮雨,段国珍,李发毅,等.微生物菌剂对枸杞生长及土壤养分的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(1):168-175.
0
浏览量
26
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构