
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期:2011
移动端阅览
曾洁萍, 丁红, 阎博华, 等. 雅连、味连治疗复发性口疮疗效差异性——分层区组、随机双盲、平行对照、多中心临床试验报告[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2011,17(20):265-268.
ZENG Jie-ping, DING Hong, YAN Bo-hua, et al. Mutli-center Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial on Functional Difference between and in Relieving Recurrent Aphthae[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2011, 17(20): 265-268.
曾洁萍, 丁红, 阎博华, 等. 雅连、味连治疗复发性口疮疗效差异性——分层区组、随机双盲、平行对照、多中心临床试验报告[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2011,17(20):265-268. DOI:
ZENG Jie-ping, DING Hong, YAN Bo-hua, et al. Mutli-center Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial on Functional Difference between and in Relieving Recurrent Aphthae[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2011, 17(20): 265-268. DOI:
目的: 比较不同基源黄连(雅连、味连)治疗复发性口疮疗效差异
确定最能代表黄连清热燥湿、泻火解毒功效的基源种。 方法: 复发性口疮(心胃热盛证)的患者
随机分为2组。雅连组口服雅连提取物3 g
每日3次
味连组口服味连提取物3 g
每日3次
疗程7 d。 结果: ①共有131例受试者入并完成试验
其中味连组65例、雅连组66例。②治疗7 d后比较
两组疾病疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)
雅连优于味连;③治疗7 d后比较
两组心胃热盛证疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)
雅连优于味连。④治疗7 d后比较
两组主证(口疮疼痛、口疮溃疡大小)改善程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)
雅连优于味连。⑤味连组和雅连组均无不良事件发生。 结论: 雅连在口疮疗效、心胃热盛证疗效以及改善口疮疼痛、口疮溃疡大小症状方面优于味连。两种基源黄连中
雅连可能更能代表黄连清热燥湿、泻火解毒之功。
Objective: To compare with the different species of Chuan Fritillaria (Coptis deltoidea and Coptis chinensis)
and to identify the most effective species in clearing heat and drying damp. Method: Patients with recurrent aphthae (the syndrome of excessive heat in heart and stomach) were included and randomized into the C. deltoidea group (superfine powder of C. deltoidea 3 g
po
tid
for 7 days.) and C. chinensis group (superfine powder of C. chinensis 3 g
po
tid
for 7 days). Result: ①131 patients entered the trial
66 cases in C. deltoidea group
65 cases in C. chinensis group. After 7 days of treatment. ② The curative effect of the C. deltoidea group in relieving recurrent aphthae is better than the C. chinensis group (P<0.05). ③The curative effect of the C. deltoidea group in relieving drying dampness is better than the C. chinensis group(P<0.05). ④The changes in main symptoms such as aphthous pain and the area of aphthous ulcer were significantly different between the two group (P<0.05). ⑤No severe adverse effect was observed in two groups. Conclusion: The C. deltoidea may have a better effect than the C. chinensis in relieving recurrent aphthae
and in remedying the syndrome of excessive heat in heart and stomach
also in attenuating pain and reducing the area of aphthous ulcer. The species of C. deltoidea is more effective in clearing heat and drying dampness
alleviating pathogenic fire and deoxication than the species of C. chinensis.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621