3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素所致 被动皮肤过敏差异性研究

谭梦晖; 李秀芳; 金若敏; 姚广涛; 符胜光; 谭森文

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素所致被动皮肤过敏差异性研究

更新时间：2024-01-04

- 3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素所致被动皮肤过敏差异性研究
- Differences in Sensitivity of Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Induced by Breviscapine Among Three Rat Strains
- 中国实验方剂学杂志 2011年17卷第9期页码：169-172
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAI06A03-02);国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项项目(2009ZX0902-002)
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2011
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
谭梦晖, 李秀芳, 金若敏, 等. 3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素所致被动皮肤过敏差异性研究[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2011,17(9):169-172.

TAN Meng-hui, LI Xiu-fang, JIN Ruo-min, et al. Differences in Sensitivity of Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Induced by Breviscapine Among Three Rat Strains[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2011, 17(9): 169-172.
谭梦晖, 李秀芳, 金若敏, 等. 3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素所致被动皮肤过敏差异性研究[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2011,17(9):169-172. DOI：

TAN Meng-hui, LI Xiu-fang, JIN Ruo-min, et al. Differences in Sensitivity of Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Induced by Breviscapine Among Three Rat Strains[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2011, 17(9): 169-172. DOI：

摘要

目的: 比较F344

Wistar 3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素诱导的被动皮肤过敏(passive cutaneous anaphylaxis

PCA)反应的差异性。方法: 取3种品系大鼠随机分为阴性对照组、天花粉组、灯盏花素组。采用sc给药方式

分别给予各组动物不同的药物

进行大鼠同种或大鼠-小鼠异种PCA试验

检测给予灯盏花素后动物皮肤蓝斑吸光度(A)

比较药物对F344

Wistar 3种品系大鼠的A变化率。结果: 大鼠同种PCA试验显示:3种品系大鼠注射灯盏花素25 mg ·kg-1致敏后

F344大鼠皮肤蓝斑A为0.064±0.005 7

明显升高(P<0.05 )

Wistar大鼠PCA反应均为阴性。大鼠-小鼠异种PCA试验显示:注射F344大鼠抗血清后

小鼠异种PCA反应为阳性

A为0.10±0.01(P<0.05 )

注射SD

Wistar大鼠抗血清后

反应均为阴性。结论: 2种试验方法结果均显示

3种品系大鼠对灯盏花素的敏感性存在差异

其中以F344大鼠最为敏感。

Abstract

Objective: To compare the differences in sensitivity of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) caused by breviscapine among Sprague Dawley (SD)

Wistar

and Fischer344(F344) rats. Method: The rats in the 3 strains were randomly divided into negative control group

trichosanthin group and breviscapine group. The homologous PCA experiment was performed by using three different strains of rat and xenogenic PCA by using rats and mice. Breviscapine was given as allergen. The absorbance was measured to discriminate the severity of PCA. Result: The rat homologous PCA revealed that after injection with 25 mg · kg-1 breviscapine

F344 rat showed positive reaction

the absorbance was 0.064±0.005 7 and increased significantly (P<0.05)

but SD rat and Wistar rat showed negative reaction. Xenogeneic PCA showed that the mice injected breviscapine antiserum of F344 rat

demonstrated a positive reaction (P<0.05)

the absorbance was 0.10±0.01

the others received breviscapine antiserum of SD or Wistar rats showed negative reactions. Conclusion: There are differences in sensitivity to breviscapine among three rat strains

and F344 rat is the most sensitive one.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

大鼠被动皮肤过敏试验影响因素的研究

灯盏花素防治糖尿病并发症的研究进展

灯盏花素对缺血再灌注大鼠心肌超微结构及细胞凋亡的保护作用

2种品系大鼠被动皮肤过敏反应的差异性比较