
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期:2013
移动端阅览
闫清伟, 田青. 3种干预方法对焦虑大鼠高架十字迷宫行为的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2013,19(19):225-228.
YAN Qing-wei, TIAN Qing. Effects of 3 Kind Intervention Methods on the Behavior of Anxiety Rats in the Elevated Plus Maze Test[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(19): 225-228.
闫清伟, 田青. 3种干预方法对焦虑大鼠高架十字迷宫行为的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2013,19(19):225-228. DOI: 10.11653/syfj2013190225.
YAN Qing-wei, TIAN Qing. Effects of 3 Kind Intervention Methods on the Behavior of Anxiety Rats in the Elevated Plus Maze Test[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(19): 225-228. DOI: 10.11653/syfj2013190225.
目的: 比较研究不同干预方法对焦虑大鼠高架十字迷宫(EPM)实验相关行为指标的影响。方法: 对60只SD雄性大鼠随机分组
即A组(安静对照组10只)、模型组(M0组50只)
对M0组进行21 d的随机不可预知的焦虑刺激造模
同期A组不加干预;造模结束后随机将M0组分为5组进行28 d恢复
即M1组(模型恢复组
色拉油4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig)、M2组(模型运动组
色拉油4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig)、M3组(模型卵油组
卵油4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig)、M4组(模型运动卵油组
卵油4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig)、M5组(模型安定组
安定2.0 mg·kg-1·d-1 ig)
每组10只
恢复期末所有组进行EPM实验
测大鼠5 min开臂运动时间、开臂运动距离、进入开臂次数。结果: 开臂运动时间M2
M3
M4依次为(185.3±10.8)
(176.8±10.6)
(177.6±11.1)s明显高于M1(145.4±21.6)s;开臂运动距离依次为M2
M3
M4(975.5±27.1)
(945.7±19.7)
(947.1±18.9)cm明显高于M1(732.9±18.9)cm;进入开臂次数M2
M3
M4依次为(10.9±2.4)
(11.3±1.5)
(11.6±1.1)次
明显高于M1(7.7±1.5)次
(均P<0.05)。结论: 28 d恢复期后
运动、卵油、运动卵油复合法对焦虑行为有明显改善
运动组恢复最佳
但自然恢复手段在28 d内无明显效果。
Objective: To compare the impact of different interventions on the behavior indicators of anxiety rats within the Elevated Plus Maze test(EPM). Method: Sixty SD male rats were randomized to group A (quiet control group
10 rats) and model group(group M0
50 rats). Group M0 received 21d randomal and unpredictable anxiety stimuli for modeling
while at the same time group A received no intervention. Then group M0 was randomly divided into five groups
including model recovery group
Salad oil 4.0 g·kg-1·d-1ig(M1)
model exercise group
Salad oil 4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig(M2)
model Rana egg oil group
4.0 g·kg-1·d-1ig(M3)
model exercise-Rana egg oil group
4.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig(M4)
model drug control group
Diazepam 2.0 g·kg-1·d-1 ig(M5)
10 rats in each group. With different recovery methods each group would have a 28d recovery
and at the end of the recovery
all groups received a EPM (elevated plus maze) experiment
and behavioral indicators were collected to compare the differences. Result: The open arm movement time in group M2
M3 and M4 was (185.3±10.8)
(176.8±10.6)
(177.6±11.1)s
which was significantly higher than that of M1 (145.4±21.6)s. The open arm movement distance (cm) of M2
M3 and M4 was (975.5±27.1)
(945.7±19.7)
(947.1±18.9)cm
which was significantly higher than that of M1 (732.9±18.9)cm; the open arm entries of M2
M3 and M4 were (10.9±2.4)
(11.3±1.5)
(11.6±1.1)
which was significantly higher than that of M1 (7.7±1.5)
(each P<0.05). Conclusion: After a 28 d recovery period
exercise
Rana egg oil
and exercise-Rana egg oil methods could significantly relieve anxiety behavior
the exercise group recovered best
but the natural recovery means had no significant effect after 28 days.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621