
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期:2013
移动端阅览
方刚, 梁峰艳, 张静蕾, 等. 中医药治疗盆腔瘀血综合征系统评价[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2013,19(20):311-318.
FANG Gang, LIANG Feng-yan, ZHANG Jing-lei, et al. Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome System Evaluation[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(20): 311-318.
方刚, 梁峰艳, 张静蕾, 等. 中医药治疗盆腔瘀血综合征系统评价[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2013,19(20):311-318. DOI: 10.11653/syfj2013200311.
FANG Gang, LIANG Feng-yan, ZHANG Jing-lei, et al. Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome System Evaluation[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2013, 19(20): 311-318. DOI: 10.11653/syfj2013200311.
目的: 对中医药治疗盆腔瘀血综合征(PCS)的临床研究进行系统评价和Meta分析
了解中医药治疗PCS的临床效果
从而指导临床中医药治疗盆腔瘀血综合征的应用。方法: 按照循证医学的原则和方法
通过计算机和手工检索近20年来中医药治疗盆腔瘀血综合征的随机对照文献
对纳入的文献进行系统评价并进行Meta分析。结果: 纳入17篇文献
3篇采用随机数字表分组的方法
3篇采用门诊就诊顺序的半随机分组;仅有1篇采用单盲;1篇有明确的纳入和排除标准;8篇有具体的统计学方法
有具体的统计量和P;5篇提到随访;所有文献均未描述退出与失访病例;3篇提及了对不良反应的观察;所有文献都未描述是否实施分配方案的隐匿;方法学质量评分
3个为2分
其余均为1分。Meta分析结果显示:中医药对本病的疗效与西医比较有一定的优势
中西医结合治疗优于单纯西药疗效
不同中药的疗效有差异性。结论: 中医药治疗研究质量有待进一步提高。Meta分析显示中医药治疗PCS较西医有一定优势
不同中医药的疗效也有差异
但肯定的疗效证据强度不够
需高质量、大样本、多中心的随机对照试验的进一步证实。
Objective: To investigate the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) of clinical research on system evaluation and Meta analysis
to understand the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine treatment of PCS
so as to guide clinical traditional Chinese medicine treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome application. Method: According to the principle of evidence-based medicine and methods
through the computer and manual retrieval in the recent 20 years of traditional Chinese medicine to pelvic congestion syndrome of randomized controlled literatures
in the literature evaluation system and Meta analysis. Result: Into 17 articles
3 article using table of random number grouping method
3 article using the order of clinic on a half random grouping. Only 1 article by a single blind. 1 article clear into and exclusion standard. Article 8 a specific statistical methods
there are specific statistics and value. Five articles mentioned follow-up. All documents were not describe exit and lost to follow-up cases. 3 article mentioned the adverse reaction of observation. All documents do not describe whether to implement scheme of hiding. Methodological quality score
3 to 2 points
the others all is 1 minute. Meta analysis results showed that the curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine of the comparison with western medicine has a certain advantage
combining traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment is superior to pure western medicine curative effect
the effect of different Chinese traditional medicine have difference. Conclusion: The quality of traditional Chinese medicine to study further improve. Meta analysis showed that traditional Chinese medicine treatment of PCS is western medicine have certain advantages
the effect of different traditional Chinese medicine also has difference
it is a kind of promising treatments. But certain curative effect evidence strength is not enough
should be high quality
large sample
multicenter randomized controlled trial of further confirmed.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621