
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
辽宁中医药大学 药学院,辽宁 大连 116600
[第一作者] 崔亚晨,在读硕士,从事中药炮制学研究,E-mail:cuiyachentcm@163.com
*高慧,博士,教授,从事中药炮制原理研究,Tel:0411-85890151,E-mail:gaohuitcm@163.com
收稿日期:2019-04-30,
网络出版日期:2019-07-19,
纸质出版日期:2020-01-05
移动端阅览
崔亚晨, 单丽倩, 刘晓峰, 等. 不同胆汁及其制成的胆南星对LPS诱导的急性肺损伤大鼠保护作用考察[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020,26(1):125-132.
Ya-chen CUI, Li-qian SHAN, Xiao-feng LIU, et al. Investigation of Protective Effect of Different Bile and Their Arisaema cum Bile on Acute Lung Injury Rats Induced by LPS[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2020, 26(1): 125-132.
崔亚晨, 单丽倩, 刘晓峰, 等. 不同胆汁及其制成的胆南星对LPS诱导的急性肺损伤大鼠保护作用考察[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020,26(1):125-132. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20192153.
Ya-chen CUI, Li-qian SHAN, Xiao-feng LIU, et al. Investigation of Protective Effect of Different Bile and Their Arisaema cum Bile on Acute Lung Injury Rats Induced by LPS[J]. Chinese journal of experimental traditional medical formulae, 2020, 26(1): 125-132. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20192153.
目的:
2
比较不同胆汁(猪、牛、羊胆汁)及其制成的胆南星对急性肺损伤大鼠的保护作用,以期为胆南星的胆汁选择和饮片分级提供参考。
方法:
2
Wistar雄性大鼠96只,随机分为空白组、模型组、猪胆汁组、牛胆汁组、羊胆汁组、猪胆南星组、牛胆南星组、羊胆南星组,各给药组大鼠每天按2.52 g·kg
-1
灌胃给予相应药液,空白组和模型组大鼠每天灌胃给予同体积生理盐水,共8 d。第8天,模型组和各给药组大鼠灌胃1 h后,腹腔注射脂多糖(LPS,2 mg·kg
-1
)制备大鼠肺损伤模型,注射LPS后3,6,24 h各取4只大鼠,取血和肺组织。测定肺系数、肺含水量及肺组织湿重/干重比值(
W
/
D
);利用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定血清中的肿瘤坏死因子-
α
(TNF-
α
),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),血栓素B
2
(TXB
2
)含量,以及肺组织中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD),谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)活性和丙二醛(MDA)和基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)含量;观察大鼠肺组织病理形态,计算大鼠肺组织损伤评分。
结果:
2
与同时间点模型组比较,猪胆汁、牛胆汁、羊胆汁及其制成的胆南星给药组大鼠肺系数、肺含水量及
W
/
D
均降低,且大部分具有显著性差异(
P
<
0.05,
P
<
0.01);能够降低模型大鼠血清TNF-
α
,IL-6,TXB
2
的含量,降低肺组织中MDA和MMP-9含量,以及提高肺组织中GSH-Px和SOD活性,且大部分具有显著性差异(
P
<
0.05,
P
<
0.01)。牛胆汁组和羊胆汁组在大多数评价指标方面优于猪胆汁组,胆南星(牛胆汁制)和胆南星(羊胆汁制)在大多数评价指标方面优于胆南星组(猪胆汁制),且部分具有显著性差异(
P
<
0.05,
P
<
0.01)。
结论:
2
不同胆汁(猪、牛、羊)及其制成的胆南星均对LPS诱发的急性肺损伤大鼠具有保护作用,且牛胆汁和羊胆汁治疗效果优于猪胆汁,胆南星(牛胆汁制)和胆南星(羊胆汁制)治疗效果优于胆南星(猪胆汁制)。
Objective:
2
To compare the protective effect of different bile (porcine bile
oxgall and sheep bile) and their Arisaema cum Bile on rats with acute lung injury
so as to provide reference for the selection of bile and the classification of decoction pieces of Arisaema cum Bile.
Method:
2
Wistar male rats were randomly divided into 8 groups (
n
=12)
including blank group
model group
porcine bile group
oxgall group
sheep bile group
Arisaema cum Bile with porcine bile group
Arisaema cum Bile with oxgall group and Arisaema cum Bile with sheep bile group. Rats in each treatment group were given corresponding drug solution by gavage at 2.52 g·kg
-1
every day
and rats in the model group and the blank group were given the same volume of normal saline by gavage every day for a total of 8 days. On the 8
th
day
after 1 h of administration
rats in the model group and each treatment group were intraperitoneally injected lipopolysaccharide (LPS
2 mg·kg
-1
) to prepare rat lung injury model. Blood and lung tissues were collected from every four rats at 3
6
24 h after LPS injection
respectively. Lung coefficient
lung water content and wet weight/dry weight ratio of lung tissue (
W
/
D
) were measured
and the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
α
interleukin (IL)-6 and thromboxane B
2
(TXB
2
) in serum and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in lung tissue were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The pathological morphology of rat lung tissue was observed and the score of lung tissue injury was calculated.
Result:
2
Compared with the model group at the same time point
the lung coefficient
W
/
D
lung water content
contents of TNF-
α
IL-6 and TXB
2
in serum
contents of MDA and MMP-9 in lung tissue of rats in each treatment group were all decreased
and most of them had significant differences (
P
<
0.05
P
<
0.01)
but the activities of GSH-Px and SOD were all increased
and most of them had significant differences (
P
<
0.05
P
<
0.01). The oxgall group and the sheep bile group were superior to the porcine bile group in most of the indexes
the Arisaema cum Bile with oxgall group and the Arisaema cum Bile with sheep bile group were superior to the Arisaema cum Bile with porcine bile group
and some of them had significant differences(
P
<
0.05
P
<
0.01).
Conclusion:
2
Each bile group and each Arisaema cum Bile group all have protective effects on rats with acute lung injury induced by LPS
and the therapeutic effect of oxgall and sheep bile is better than that of porcine bile
the therapeutic effect of Arisaema cum Bile prepared by oxgall and sheep bile is better than that of Arisaema cum Bile prepared by porcine bile.
国家药典委员会 . 中国人民共和国药典:一部 [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2015 : 261 .
贾天柱 . 中药炮制学 [M]. 2版 . 上海 : 上海科学技术出版社 , 2013 : 284 - 285 .
陈江宁 , 单国顺 , 赵启苗 , 等 . 不同胆汁制胆南星中胆酸类成分及其解热作用比较 [J]. 现代药物与临床 , 2017 , 32 ( 4 ): 567 - 571 .
陈江宁 , 单国顺 , 刘晓瑜 , 等 . 胆南星辅料成分分析及其清热作用 [J]. 中国现代中药 , 2016 , 18 ( 7 ): 837 - 840 .
刘晓月 , 陶鑫 , 潘多 , 等 . 胆南星化学成分的研究 [J]. 中成药 , 2018 , 40 ( 9 ): 1991 - 1995 .
张智琳 , 周丽梅 , 江沂 , 等 . 清热化痰法对急性肺损伤大鼠干预作用的研究 [J]. 实用医学杂志 , 2013 , 29 ( 12 ): 1913 - 1915 .
庄先飞 , 俞苏岚 , 樊梦霖 , 等 . 中药复方防治急性肺损伤的作用机制研究进展 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2012 , 18 ( 17 ): 326 - 331 .
郑丰杰 , 李宇航 , 王庆国 , 等 . 清热解毒有配伍桔梗汤对急性肺损伤模型治疗作用的实验观察 [J]. 中华中医药学刊 , 2008 , 26 ( 5 ): 944 - 946 .
施展 , 刘颖颖 , 武荣 . 不同剂量脂多糖对新生SD大鼠的影响 [J]. 中国医药导报 , 2016 , 13 ( 25 ): 34 - 37 .
王婷 , 梁华平 , 柴鉴深 , 等 . 三种大鼠急性肺损伤模型的比较 [J]. 成都医学院学报 , 2016 , 11 ( 1 ): 5 - 9 .
宣国平 , 张琳 , 钟明媚 . 脂多糖致大鼠急性肺损伤模型取材时间选择 [J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志 , 2015 , 29 ( 2 ): 136 - 138 .
张亚平 , 张广平 , 苏萍 , 等 . 不同途径吸入脂多糖致大鼠急性肺炎模型的优选 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2018 , 24 ( 7 ): 82 - 88 .
K Mikawa , K Nishina , Y Takao , et al . ONO-1714,a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor,attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung in rabbits [J]. Anesth Analg , 2003 , 97 ( 6 ): 1751 - 1755 .
陈龙 , 朱煊 , 陈西艳 , 等 . 丙泊酚对内毒素性肺损伤大鼠血清TNF- α 、IL-1 β 及IL-10的影响 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志 , 2011 , 27 ( 8 ): 815 - 817 .
熊秋迎 , 陈乔 , 谢斌 , 等 . 二冬膏对急性肺损伤模型鼠TNF- α ,IL-6含量及AQP-5蛋白表达的影响 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2015 , 21 ( 20 ): 167 - 170 .
常秀娟 , 张帅 , 江益平 , 等 . 从细胞因子风暴探讨热毒宁注射液抗大鼠急性肺损伤作用机制 [J]. 中草药 , 2015 , 46 ( 2 ): 236 - 239 .
杨翠萍 , 杨晓金 , 田真真 , 等 . 槐定碱对急性肺损伤小鼠肺组织SOD、MDA及TLR4表达的影响 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2012 , 18 ( 14 ): 180 - 184 .
0
浏览量
19
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621