
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.成都中医药大学 药学院,中药材标准化教育部重点实验室, 西南特色中药资源国家重点实验室,成都 611137
2.四川省食品药品检验检测院,成都 611731
冯靖雯,在读硕士,从事中药物质基础与质量标准化研究,E-mail:517244131@qq.com
陈鸿平,博士,教授,从事中药物质基础与质量标准化研究,E-mail:chen-hongping@126.com
收稿日期:2020-11-12,
网络出版日期:2021-01-19,
纸质出版日期:2021-05-20
移动端阅览
冯靖雯,郭小红,张砚等.不同花期闹羊花中挥发性成分的GC-IMS分析[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(10):85-92.
FENG Jing-wen,GUO Xiao-hong,ZHANG Yan,et al.GC-IMS Analysis of Volatile Components in Rhododendri Mollis Flos at Different Flowering Stages[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(10):85-92.
冯靖雯,郭小红,张砚等.不同花期闹羊花中挥发性成分的GC-IMS分析[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(10):85-92. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20210746.
FENG Jing-wen,GUO Xiao-hong,ZHANG Yan,et al.GC-IMS Analysis of Volatile Components in Rhododendri Mollis Flos at Different Flowering Stages[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(10):85-92. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20210746.
目的
2
明确闹羊花的挥发性成分并比较不同花期样品的挥发性成分差异。
方法
2
采用气相色谱-离子迁移谱法(GC-IMS)对5个不同花期(花蕾期、初开期、半开期、盛开期、盛开末期)闹羊花样品的挥发性成分进行检测;利用GC-IMS谱图结合聚类分析、主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘法-判别分析(OPLS-DA)比较不同花期样品的挥发性成分异同。
结果
2
GC-IMS检测出了不同花期闹羊花中的70种挥发性成分,其中67种为共有成分,定性确定了47种,以醇类、酯类、醛类为主。香芹醇是盛开末期样品特有成分;
α
-松油醇在初开期样品中的含量最高,盛开期、盛开末期样品中则未检出。活性成分(甲基庚烯酮,壬醛,
α
-松油醇,桉叶油醇,氧化芳樟醇,1-辛烯-3-醇,反式-3-己烯-1-醇)相对质量分数之和在花期中呈下降趋势。GC-IMS图谱显示不同花期样品有各自的特征峰区域,也有共同区域。聚类分析,PCA及OPLS-DA结果均显示,不同花期样品区分明显;通过OPLS-DA筛选获得19种区分不同花期样品的差异成分,包括
γ
-丁内酯、桉叶油醇、乙酸乙酯等。
结论
2
不同花期闹羊花样品可明显区分且其挥发性成分中的活性物质随花开放的程度逐步散失,可为闹羊花的物质基础完善及不同花期研究提供参考。
Objective
2
The volatile components of Rhododendri Mollis Flos were determined and the differences of volatile components at different flowering stages were compared and analyzed.
Method
2
Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) was used to detect the volatile components in Rhododendri Mollis Flos at different flowering stages (bud stage, initial flowering stage, half-flowering stage, blooming stage and late blooming stage). GC-IMS spectra combined with cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to compare the differences and similarities of volatile components in different flowering stages.
Result
2
A total of 70 volatile components in Rhododendri Mollis Flos at different flowering stages were detected, among which 67 were common components, and 47 were identified qualitatively, mainly alcohols, esters and aldehydes. Carveol was a special component at the late blooming stage. The content of alpha-terpineol is the highest at the initial flowering stage, but not at the blooming stage and late blooming stage. The relative contents of the active ingredients [6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, nonanal, alpha-terpineol, 1,8-cineole, linalool oxide, 1-octen-3-ol, (
E
)-3-hexenol] showed a decreasing trend during flowering stages. GC-IMS spectra showed that the samples at different flowering stages had their own characteristic peak regions, and also had common regions. The results of cluster analysis, PCA and OPLS-DA all showed that the samples at different flowering stages were distinguishable. OPLS-DA was used to screen 19 different components to distinguish different flowering stages, including
γ
-butyrolactone, 1,8-cineole, ethyl hexanoate, etc.
Conclusion
2
Rhododendri Mollis Flos samples at different flowering stages can be distinguished obviously, and the active substances in the volatile components are gradually dissipated with the degree of flower opening, which can provide reference for the improvement of material basis and the study of different flowering stages of Rhododendri Mollis Flos.
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典:一部 [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 .
陈嘉谟 . 本草蒙筌 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 1988 .
李时珍 . 本草纲目 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2007 .
郭小红 , 冯靖雯 , 尤强 , 等 . 有毒中药闹羊花的现代研究进展 [J]. 中国药业 , 2020 , 29 ( 23 ): 96 - 104 .
ZHANG J , LIU J , DAI L F , et al . Unlocking the potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Rhododendron molle G. Don [J]. Pak J Pharm Sci , 2019 , 32 ( 5 ): 2375 - 2383 .
苏晶 , 李宜航 , 周玲娟 , 等 . 基于HS-GC-MS及化学计量学的不同形态龙血树属含脂药材的成分差异比较研究 [J]. 中国中药杂志 , 2020 , 45 ( 14 ): 3467 - 3474 .
祝婧 , 袁恩 , 陈香玲 , 等 . 江西特色炮制工艺对升麻挥发性成分的影响 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2019 , 25 ( 21 ): 95 - 105 .
章辰飞 , 鲁昌鑫 , 汪庆昊 , 等 . 两种杜鹃不同花期的挥发性成分分析 [J]. 分子植物育种 , 2020 , 18 ( 11 ): 278 - 289 .
杨华 , 韩素芳 , 宋绪忠 . 马银花开花过程挥发性成分的变化 [J]. 森林与环境学报 , 2016 , 36 ( 3 ): 355 - 359 .
VAUTZ W , FRANZKE J , ZAMPOLLI S , et al . On the potential of ion mobility spectrometry coupled to GC pre-separation—a tutorial [J]. Anal Chim Acta , 2018 , 1024 : 52 - 64
SUN X , GU D Y , FU Q B , et al . Content variations in compositions and volatile component in jujube fruits during the blacking process [J]. Food Sci Nutr , 2019 , 7 ( 4 ): 1387 - 1395 .
周倩 , 戴衍朋 , 郭威 , 等 . 基于顶空-气相色谱-离子迁移谱的生、炙甘草饮片挥发性有机物指纹图谱分析 [J]. 中国中药杂志 , 2020 , 45 ( 16 ): 3857 - 3862 .
马云 , 王尧尧 , 管明瑞 , 等 . 不同发育期忍冬花颜色与气味变化 [J]. 中成药 , 2019 , 41 ( 6 ): 1349 - 1353 .
王维皓 , 杨立新 . 羌活挥发性成分GC-MS分析 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2020 , 26 ( 23 ): 153 - 160 .
黄小兰 , 何旭峰 , 杨勤 , 等 . HPLC-PDA同时测定地笋中7种酚酸的含量 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2020 , 26 ( 15 ): 156 - 162 .
宫春波 , 杨伟 , 刘永红 , 等 . 鲜姜汁抑菌效果及其在鲜肉保鲜中的研究 [J]. 肉类工业 , 2005 ( 4 ): 29 - 31 .
孙和龙 . α -水芹烯及壬醛对番茄圆弧青霉和灰霉的抑菌作用研究 [D]. 湘潭 : 湘潭大学 , 2017 .
石超峰 , 殷中琼 , 魏琴 , 等 . α -松油醇对大肠杆菌的抑菌作用及其机理研究 [J]. 畜牧兽医学报 , 2013 , 44 ( 5 ): 796 - 801 .
胡文杰 , 戴彩华 , 周升团 . 油樟叶精油馏分的主要成分、抑菌活性及其主要单体成分抑菌机理研究 [J]. 安徽农学通报 , 2019 , 25 ( 15 ): 14 - 19 .
钟永志 , 谢明惠 , 林璐璐 , 等 . 草地贪夜蛾对氧化芳樟醇的趋性 [J]. 植物保护 , 2020 , 46 ( 4 ): 178 - 180,222 .
李春晓 , 阎婷 , 董言德 , 等 . 1-辛烯-3-醇对我国稻田区主要媒介蚊种的引诱作用研究 [J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报 , 2019 , 26 ( 2 ): 88 - 91 .
0
浏览量
19
下载量
10
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621