
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.云南中医药大学 中药学院,昆明 650500
2.中国中医科学院 中药研究所,北京 100700
陈佳颖,硕士,从事中药优良种源选育研究,E-mail:1218239489@qq.com
* 李西文,副研究员,博士生导师,从事品质中药材栽培及育种研究,E-mail:xwli@icmm.ac.cn
收稿日期:2021-02-17,
网络出版日期:2021-04-01,
纸质出版日期:2021-10-20
移动端阅览
陈佳颖,王业,徐福荣等.强光胁迫下农田人参不同表型种质抗性评价[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(20):121-129.
CHEN Jia-ying,WANG Ye,XU Fu-rong,et al.Resistance Evaluation of Different Phenotypes of Farmland Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Germplasm Under High Light Stress[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(20):121-129.
陈佳颖,王业,徐福荣等.强光胁迫下农田人参不同表型种质抗性评价[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(20):121-129. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20211349.
CHEN Jia-ying,WANG Ye,XU Fu-rong,et al.Resistance Evaluation of Different Phenotypes of Farmland Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma Germplasm Under High Light Stress[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(20):121-129. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20211349.
目的
2
探究农田栽培模式下不同表型人参对强光胁迫的生理响应,为农田参新品种选育和田间精细管理提供理论支撑。
方法
2
以4年生不同茎色人参植株为试验材料,无色透光薄膜代替蓝膜进行强光胁迫,考察人参叶片生长状态、叶片光响应曲线、光合和荧光等参数变化,同时分析胁迫前后叶片超微结构特征,比较不同表型人参对强光生理适应性及细胞超微结构差异。
结果
2
在强光胁迫下,人参叶色变浅,叶绿素含量大幅减少,叶缘出现“灼烧”现象。紫茎人参最大净光合速率和光饱和点均大于绿茎人参;紫茎人参蒸腾速率和水分利用率等气体交换参数具有逆境优势;光合电子传递速率、最大光化学效率、光化学猝灭系数等叶绿素荧光参数均高于绿茎人参。2种种质超微结构均有变化,绿茎人参质壁分离现象更加明显,叶绿体膜破裂,内含物外渗,淀粉粒、嗜锇小体累积数量增多;紫茎叶绿体膜结构相对稳定,多泡体数目强光下比绿茎增加显著。
结论
2
强光胁迫下不同茎色的农田人参叶片生长均受到抑制,绿茎人参受强光胁迫后光合效率大幅下降,叶绿体完整性受到破坏,对逆境的生理抵抗性较弱。紫茎人参通过自身特殊的细胞构造和非光化学猝灭优势,减缓了强光胁迫对植株光合系统的破坏,可培育成抗逆新品种。
Objective
2
To investigate the physiological response of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma with different phenotypes to high light stress under farmland cultivation mode, and to provide theoretical support for breeding of and fine management of new varieties of farmland ginseng.
Method
2
Four-year-old ginseng plants with different stem colors were used as materials, and blue film was replaced by the colorless and translucent film for performing high light stress and investigating the change of growth status, light response curve, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters of ginseng leaves. Meanwhile, the physiological adaptability and cell ultrastructural differences of ginseng with different phenotypes for strong light were compared by analyzing the variation of leaf ultrastructural characteristics before and after the stress.
Result
2
The color of ginseng leaves became weak and the content of chlorophyll was greatly decreased with burning phenomenon on the leaf margin under high light stress. The maximum net photosynthetic rate and light saturation point of purple-stem ginseng were higher than those of green-stem ginseng. Transpiration rate, water use efficiency and other gas exchange parameters of purple-stem ginseng had adversity advantages, photosynthetic electron transport rate, maximum photochemical efficiency, photochemical quenching coefficient and other chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were higher than those of green-stem ginseng. There were changes in ultrastructure of the two germplasms, and the plasmolysis of green-stem ginseng was more obvious, its chloroplast membrane ruptured, the contents were exuded and the accumulation of starch grains and osmiophilic bodies increased. The chloroplast membrane structure of purple-stem germplasm was relatively stable, and its number of multivesicular bodies increased significantly by comparing with that of green-stem ginseng under high light.
Conclusion
2
High light stress inhibits the leaf growth of farmland ginseng with different stem colors. The photosynthetic efficiency of green-stem ginseng is obviously reduced, and the integrity of chloroplast is damaged, leading to the weak physiological resistance. The purple-stem ginseng can reduce the damage of the photosynthetic system of plants under high light stress by its special cell structure and non-photochemical quenching advantages. Therefore, the purple-stem ginseng can be cultivated into a new resistant variety.
王利群 . 中国人参栽培史考 [J]. 人参研究 , 2001 , 13 ( 4 ): 46 - 48 .
任跃英 , 张益胜 , 李国君 , 等 . 非林地人参种植基地建设的优势分析 [J]. 人参研究 , 2011 , 23 ( 2 ): 34 - 37 .
LIU L , XU F R , WANG Y Z . Traditional uses,chemical diversity and biological activities of Panax L. (Araliaceae):a review [J]. J Ethnopharmacol , 2020 , 263 : 112792 .
陈东亮 , 钟楚 , 简少芬 , 等 . 人参种质资源及育种研究进展 [J]. 贵州农业科学 , 2020 , 48 ( 10 ): 111 - 116 .
牛玮浩 , 徐江 , 董林林 , 等 . 农田栽参的研究进展及优势分析 [J]. 世界科学技术—中医药现代化 , 2016 , 18 ( 11 ): 1981 - 1987 .
董林林 , 徐江 , 牛玮浩 , 等 . 改良措施对农田土壤微生态及人参存苗率的影响 [J]. 中国中药杂志 , 2016 , 41 ( 23 ): 4334 - 4339 .
常思佳 , 宁雪 , 王日明 , 等 . 日光温室栽培模式下不同种质来源人参单体皂苷及氨基酸对比分析 [J]. 人参研究 , 2019 , 31 ( 3 ): 18 - 24 .
任跃英 . 人参育种的种质资源及生物学基础的研究 [J]. 人参研究 , 2012 , 24 ( 1 ): 24 - 29 .
SONG Q H , SU R N , CHAI Y M , et al . High photosynthetic capability observed in the wheat germplasm with rye chromosomes [J]. J Plant Physiol , 2017 , 216 : 202 - 211 .
JUNG J H , KIM H Y , KIM H S , et al . Transcriptome analysis of Panax ginseng response to high light stress [J]. J Ginseng Res , 2020 , 44 ( 2 ): 312 - 320 .
NAM M H , HEO E J , KIM J Y , et al . Proteome analysis of the responses of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer leaves to high light:use of electrospray ionization quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry and expressed sequence tag data [J]. Proteomics , 2003 , 3 ( 12 ): 2351 - 2367 .
岑海燕 , 姚洁妮 , 翁海勇 , 等 . 叶绿素荧光技术在植物表型分析的研究进展 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析 , 2018 , 38 ( 12 ): 3773 - 3779 .
刘彤 , 徐浩玉 , 金慧颖 , 等 . 不同光照条件下东北红豆杉幼苗叶绿素荧光特性日变化 [J]. 植物研究 , 2015 , 35 ( 6 ): 848 - 853 .
张盹明 , 杨自辉 , 王继和 , 等 . 2种麻黄光合及其耐逆性分析 [J]. 西北植物学报 , 2007 , 27 ( 7 ): 1473 - 1478 .
苏春桃 , 杨浩 , 高秀梅 , 等 . 高光效甘薯种质筛选及光合特性分析 [J]. 热带作物学报 , 2020 , 41 ( 12 ): 2462 - 2466 .
刘志辉 , 朱旭东 . 叶绿素荧光分析技术在烟草研究中的应用 [J]. 安徽农业科学 , 2015 , 43 ( 3 ): 10 - 11 .
吴廷娟 , 田梦平 , 谢小龙 . 不同地黄品种光合特性的比较研究 [J]. 世界科学技术—中医药现代化 , 2020 , 22 ( 8 ): 2899 - 2906 .
徐克章 , 张美善 , 武志海 , 等 . 人参不同生育期叶片光合作用变化的研究 [J]. 作物学报 , 2006 , 32 ( 10 ): 1519 - 1524 .
李晨曦 , 何章 , 许永华 , 等 . 不同遮荫棚下农田人参叶片光合特性的生育期变化 [J]. 吉林农业大学学报 , 2017 , 39 ( 1 ): 32 - 37,48 .
YU K W , MURTHY H N , HAHN E , et al . Ginsenoside production by hairy root cultures of Panax ginseng :influence of temperature and light quality [J]. Biochem Eng J , 2005 , 23 ( 1 ): 53 - 56 .
CHENO S K , LEE T S , YOON J H , et al . Effect of light transmittance control on the root yield and quality during the growing season of Panax ginseng [J]. J Ginseng Res , 2004 , 28 ( 4 ): 196 - 200 .
CHENO S K , LEE T S , YOON J H , et al . Effect of light transmittance control on the growth status of aerial parts during the growing season of Panax ginseng [J]. J Ginseng Res , 2003 , 27 ( 4 ): 202 - 206 .
姜建福 , 张颖 , 田智硕 , 等 . 葡萄属植物叶片显微和超微结构观察 [J]. 西北植物学报 , 2012 , 32 ( 7 ): 1365 - 1371 .
SONG X H , WANG K , GUO L L , et al . Effects of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase on the root growth of rice under cadmium stress [J]. 农业科学与技术:英文版 , 2011 , 12 ( 9 ): 1256 - 1259 .
朱素琴 , 何玲艳 , 张千千 , 等 . 植物细胞内ROS的种类及其产生部位 [J]. 安徽农业科学 , 2012 , 40 ( 34 ): 16536 - 16540 .
ZHANG R , WISE R R , STRUCK K R , et al . Moderate heat stress of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves causes chloroplast swelling and plastoglobule formation [J]. Photosynth Res , 2010 , 105 ( 2 ): 123 - 134 .
陈士林 , 孙奕 , 万会花 , 等 . 中药与天然药物2015~2020年研究亮点评述 [J]. 药学学报 , 2020 , 55 ( 12 ): 2751 - 2776 .
XU J , CHU Y , LIAO B S , et al . Panax ginseng genome examination for ginsenoside biosynthesis [J]. GigaScience , 2017 , 6 ( 11 ): 1 - 15 .
0
浏览量
18
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621