
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国中医科学院 中药研究所,北京 100700
2.山西医科大学 药学院,太原 030001
王丽霞,在读硕士,从事饮片化学成分及炮制原理研究,E-mail:wanglxia95@163.com
唐力英,副研究员,从事饮片化学成分及炮制原理研究,E-mail:bjtangliying@163.com
王祝举,研究员,从事饮片化学成分及炮制原理研究,E-mail:wangzhuju@sina.com
收稿日期:2021-05-08,
网络出版日期:2021-06-07,
纸质出版日期:2021-11-20
移动端阅览
王丽霞,刘聪,杨晓芸等.四制艾叶炮制前后的UPLC指纹图谱及主要成分含量比较[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(22):147-154.
WANG Li-xia,LIU Cong,YANG Xiao-yun,et al.Comparison of UPLC Fingerprint and Determination of Main Components Before and After Processing of Artemisiae Argyi Folium Processed with Four Excipients[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(22):147-154.
王丽霞,刘聪,杨晓芸等.四制艾叶炮制前后的UPLC指纹图谱及主要成分含量比较[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2021,27(22):147-154. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20211759.
WANG Li-xia,LIU Cong,YANG Xiao-yun,et al.Comparison of UPLC Fingerprint and Determination of Main Components Before and After Processing of Artemisiae Argyi Folium Processed with Four Excipients[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2021,27(22):147-154. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20211759.
目的
2
建立艾叶及四制艾叶的超高效液相色谱法(UPLC)指纹图谱,并对其所含的8种酚酸及黄酮类成分进行定量分析,探索四制艾叶质量评价方法。
方法
2
采用UPLC,Shim-pack XR-ODS C
18
色谱柱(2.0 mm×75 mm,2.2 µm),流动相乙腈(A)-0.2 %甲酸水溶液(B)梯度洗脱(0~1 min,10%A;1~2 min,10%~15%A;2~17 min,15%~18%A;17~24 min,18%~28%A;24~36 min,28%~38%A;36~41 min,38%~60%A;41~45 min,60%~100%A),检测波长330 nm,流速0.2 mL·min
-1
,建立艾叶、四制艾叶的UPLC指纹图谱,通过化学计量学方法对艾叶炮制前后指纹图谱进行分析,并对新绿原酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸、棕矢车菊素、异泽兰黄素和异绿原酸A~C进行含量测定。
结果
2
建立了艾叶及四制艾叶的指纹图谱,艾叶及四制艾叶UPLC指纹图谱一致性较好,相似度均
>
0.94。与艾叶比较,四制后绿原酸和异绿原酸B的含量无明显变化,棕矢车菊素和异泽兰黄素含量下降;而新绿原酸、隐绿原酸和异绿原酸C含量显著升高(
P
<
0.01),平均升高率分别达到32.50%,66.83%和29.39%;异绿原酸A含量显著降低(
P
<
0.01),平均降低率达51.25%。
结论
2
艾叶与四制艾叶的化学成分含量发生了一定程度改变,其中新绿原酸、隐绿原酸、异绿原酸A和异绿原酸C可作为艾叶四制前后质量评价的关键性指标,可为艾叶和四制艾叶质量的深入研究及质量标准的建立提供科学依据。
Objective
2
To establish the ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) fingerprints of Artemisiae Argyi Folium and Artemisiae Argyi Folium processed with four excipients, and quantitatively analyze the 8 phenolic acids and flavonoids contained in them, in order to explore the quality evaluation method of Artemisiae Argyi Folium processed with four excipients.
Method
2
UPLC was used with Shim-pack XR-ODS C
18
column (2.0 mm×75 mm, 2.2 µm), mobile phase of acetonitrile (A) -0.2% formic acid aqueous solution (B) for gradient elution (0-1 min, 10%A; 1-2 min, 10%-15%A; 2-17 min, 15%-18%A; 17-24 min, 18%-28%A; 24-36 min, 28%-38%A; 36-41 min, 38%-60%A; 41-45 min, 60%-100%A), detection wavelength of 330 nm and flow rate of 0.2 mL·min
-1
. The UPLC fingerprints of Artemisiae Argyi Folium before and after processing were established, and analyzed by chemometrics. Contents of 5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-caffeoylquinic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, jaceosidin and epuatilin in the decoction pieces were determined.
Result
2
The fingerprints of Artemisiae Argyi Folium before and after processing were established, and the UPLC characteristic chromatograms of Artemisiae Argyi Folium before and after processing had good consistency, and the similarity was
>
0.94. Compared with Artemisiae Argyi Folium, the contents of 3-caffeoylquinic acid and 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid had no significant change after processing, the contents of jaceosidin and epuatilin decreased after processing, while the contents of 5-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-caffeoylquinic acid and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid increased significantly (
P<
0.01), their average increasing rates were 32.50%, 66.83%, 29.39%, respectively. And content of 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid was significantly decreased (
P<
0.01) , and the average reduction rate was 51.25%.
Conclusion
2
The contents of chemical components in Artemisiae Argyi Folium and Artemisiae Argyi Folium processed with four excipients have changed to a certain extent. Among them, 5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4-caffeoylquinic acid and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid can be used as the key indicators for quality evaluation of Artemisiae Argyi Folium before and after processing.
国家药典委员会 . 中国人民共和国药典:一部 [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 : 91 .
袁林祥 , 吴航宇 , 邱彩玲 . 艾叶的药物活性成分、药理作用及临床应用浅析 [J]. 当代医药论丛 , 2020 , 18 ( 2 ): 171 - 173 .
蒋志惠 , 常雪梅 , 张照然 , 等 . 艾草的化学成分和药理作用研究进展 [J]. 中国兽药杂志 , 2019 , 53 ( 2 ): 76 - 85 .
梅全喜 . 艾叶的药理作用研究概况 [J]. 中草药 , 1996 , 27 ( 5 ): 311 - 314 .
吴惠时 , 麻兵继 , 单小兵 . 艾叶炮制历史沿革的研究 [J]. 中药材 , 1998 , 21 ( 10 ): 511 - 512 .
广东省卫生厅 . 广东省中药炮制规范 [M]. 广州 : 广东省卫生厅 , 1984 : 217 .
四川省食品药品监督管理局 . 四川省中药饮片炮制规范 [M]. 成都 : 四川科学技术出版社 , 2015 : 1 .
孟江 , 张英 , 曹晖 , 等 . 岭南中药炮制特色探析 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2020 , 26 ( 6 ): 193 - 200 .
孟江 , 张英 , 曹晖 , 等 . 中药蒸法的历史沿革分析 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2021 , 27 ( 10 ): 176 - 183 .
姚景南 , 肖鑫和 . 中药的炮制 [M]. 广州 : 广东科技出版社 , 1984 : 78 .
乔晶晶 , 吴啟南 , 薛敏 , 等 . 基于化学成分和药理效应比较益母草的传统加工工艺与一体化加工工艺 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2019 , 25 ( 8 ): 101 - 107 .
马慕秾 . 炮制方法对黄精多糖成分和“补气养阴”功效相关药理作用的影响 [D]. 杭州 : 浙江中医药大学 , 2019 .
0
浏览量
23
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621