
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.辽宁中医药大学 药学院,辽宁 大连 116600
2.辽宁医药职业学院,沈阳 110000
施宇,在读硕士,从事中药炮制传统理论研究,E-mail:497580710@qq.com
高慧,博士,教授,从事中药炮制原理研究,Tel:0411-85890155,E-mail:gaohuitcm@163.com
收稿日期:2021-08-28,
网络出版日期:2021-12-13,
纸质出版日期:2022-09-05
移动端阅览
施宇,刘晓峰,单丽倩等.胆南星发酵菌种的分离鉴定与复合菌种发酵初探[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(17):150-156.
SHI Yu,LIU Xiaofeng,SHAN Liqian,et al.Isolation and Identification of Arisaema Cum Bile Fermentation Strain and Preliminary Investigation on Its Compound Strain Fermentation[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(17):150-156.
施宇,刘晓峰,单丽倩等.胆南星发酵菌种的分离鉴定与复合菌种发酵初探[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(17):150-156. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20212450.
SHI Yu,LIU Xiaofeng,SHAN Liqian,et al.Isolation and Identification of Arisaema Cum Bile Fermentation Strain and Preliminary Investigation on Its Compound Strain Fermentation[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(17):150-156. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20212450.
目的
2
对胆南星发酵过程中的微生物进行分离与鉴定,筛选优势菌种并对胆南星复合菌种发酵进行探索,以解决胆南星杂菌发酵工艺产品质量及稳定性不易控制的问题。
方法
2
取胆南星发酵过程中的深层培养物进行菌种分离与纯化,运用细菌、真菌多相鉴定检测方法及全自动微生物分析系统,比对DNA序列,鉴定微生物,将分离鉴定出的菌种分别进行纯种发酵并筛选优势菌种,将筛选出的优势菌种进行复合菌种发酵探索,比较复合菌种发酵胆南星与传统发酵胆南星的指标成分含量差异。采用超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱法(UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS)对传统发酵胆南星和复合菌种发酵胆南星中的指标成分进行含量测定,流动相0.1%甲酸乙腈溶液(A)-0.1%甲酸水溶液(B)梯度洗脱(0~2 min,35%~45%A;2~10 min,45%~48%A;10~12 min,48%~100%A;12~12.01 min,100%~35%A;12.01~15 min,35%~65%A),流速0.35 mL·min
-1
,采用电喷雾电离源(ESI),负离子采集模式,扫描方式为多反应监测(MRM)模式,采集范围
m
/
z
50~1 000。
结果
2
从胆南星深层培养物中共分离鉴定了8种微生物,筛选出肠球菌属
Enterococcus
sp.(厌氧)和铅黄肠球菌
E. casseliflavus
是胆南星发酵过程中的优势菌种,以二者作为复合菌种发酵制得的胆南星与传统发酵法样品比较,游离型胆酸中的鹅去氧胆酸、猪去氧胆酸和猪胆酸质量分数分别增加1.76、0.06、0.19 mg·g
-1
,结合型胆酸中的甘氨鹅去氧胆酸、牛磺鹅去氧胆酸、甘氨猪去氧胆酸、牛磺猪去氧胆酸、甘氨猪胆酸、牛磺猪胆酸含量较传统发酵胆南星分别降低0.63、0.23、0.26、0.16、0.03、0.04 mg·g
-1
。
结论
2
复合菌种(肠球菌属和铅黄肠球菌)发酵能够使胆南星发酵更加完全,缩短发酵周期,并能够提高产品的质量及其稳定性。
Objective
2
In order to solve the problem that the quality and stability of Arisaema Cum Bile in the fermentation process with hybrid bacteria were not easy to control, the microorganism in the fermentation process of Arisaema Cum Bile was isolated and identified, the dominant strains were screened and the fermentation process of Arisaema Cum Bile with compound bacteria was investigated.
Method
2
The submerged culture during the fermentation process of Arisaema Cum Bile was taken out for strain separation and purification. Bacteria and fungi multiphase identification and detection methods and automatic microbial analysis system were used to analyze and compare DNA sequences and identify microorganisms. The isolated and identified strains were respectively inoculated and fermented. After screening the dominant strains, a preliminary exploration of compound strain fermentation were carried out. The contents of index components in Arisaema Cum Bile fermented by compound strain and traditional Arisaema Cum Bile were compared by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS). Mmobile phase was 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile solution (A)-0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (B) for gradient elution (0-2 min, 35%-45%A; 2-10 min, 45%-48%A; 10-12 min, 48%-100%A; 12-12.01 min, 100%-35%A; 12.01-15 min, 35%-65%A), the flow rate was set at 0.35 mL·min
-1
. The mass spectrographic analysis employed electrospray ionization (ESI), negative ion acquisition mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scanning mode were adopted to collect information, the collection range was
m
/
z
50-1 000.
Result
2
Eight microorganisms were isolated and identified from the submerged culture of Arisaema Cum Bile. Among them,
Enterococcus
sp. (anaerobic) and
E. casseliflavus
were selected as the dominant strains in the fermentation process. Compared with the traditional fermentation method, the contents of chenodeoxycholic acid, hyodeoxycholic acid and hyocholic acid in free cholic acid increased by 1.76, 0.06, 0.19 mg·g
-1
, respectively. In bound cholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic acid, glycohyodeoxycholic acid, taurohyodeoxycholic acid, glycohyocholic acid, taurine porcine cholic acid decreased by 0.63, 0.23, 0.26, 0.16, 0.03, 0.04 mg·g
-1
, respectively.
Conclusion
2
Arisaema Cum Bile with compound strain fermentation (
Enterococcus
sp. and
E. casseliflavus
) can be fermented more completely, the fermentation cycle can be shortened, and the quality and stability of products can be improved.
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典:一部 [M]. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 : 273 - 274 .
崔亚晨 , 单丽倩 , 单国顺 , 等 . 猪牛羊胆汁及其制成的胆南星药效作用对比研究 [J]. 中药材 , 2021 , 44 ( 3 ): 586 - 592 .
崔亚晨 , 单丽倩 , 刘晓峰 , 等 . 不同胆汁及其制成的胆南星对LPS诱导的急性肺损伤大鼠保护作用考察 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2020 , 26 ( 1 ): 125 - 132 .
陈江宁 , 单国顺 , 刘晓瑜 , 等 . 胆南星辅料成分分析及其清热作用 [J]. 中国现代中药 , 2016 , 18 ( 7 ): 837 - 840 .
江云 , 高慧 , 任玉珍 . 中药发酵技术 [M]. 北京 : 中国中医药出版社 , 2020 : 133 - 134 .
唐思园 . 胆南星发酵炮制工艺研究 [D]. 北京 : 北京中医药大学 , 2012 .
刘晓峰 , 崔亚晨 , 单国顺 , 等 . 胆南星中胆酸类成分含量测定及发酵前后含量比较 [J]. 中国现代中药 , 2019 , 21 ( 3 ): 375 - 379 .
东秀珠 , 蔡妙英 . 常见细菌系统鉴定手册 [M]. 北京 : 科学出版社 , 2001 : 349 - 350 .
KIM O S , CHO Y J , LEE K , et al . Introducing EzTaxon-e:A prokaryotic gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species [J]. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol , 2012 , 62 (Pt 3 ): 716 - 721 .
KIMURA M . The neutral theory of molecular evolution [J]. Am J Hum Genet , 1985 , 37 ( 1 ): 224 - 226 .
TAMURA K . Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood,evolutionary distance,and maximum parsimony methods [J]. Mol Biol Evol , 2011 , 28 ( 10 ): 2731 - 2739 .
SAITOU N , NEI M . The neighbour-joining method:A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees [J]. Mol Biol Evol , 1987 , 4 ( 4 ): 406 - 425 .
FELSENTEIN J . Confidence limits on phylogenies:An approach using the bootstrap [J]. Evolution , 1985 , 39 ( 4 ): 783 - 791 .
胡佳莉 , 刘林 , 李钟 , 等 . 黄精发酵过程中有效成分含量与色泽的相关性 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2020 , 26 ( 15 ): 169 - 176 .
林王敏 , 翁倩倩 , 邓爱平 , 等 . 淡豆豉的发酵工艺沿革及过程控制概述 [J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2021 , 27 ( 11 ): 222 - 232 .
艾素 , 汤伟 , 郭若琳 , 等 . 微生物发酵中草药及其活性物质的研究进展 [J]. 中国中药杂志 , 2019 , 44 ( 6 ): 1110 - 1118 .
赵佶 . 圣济总录 [M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 1962 : 189 - 190 .
0
浏览量
20
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621