
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所 循证医学基础研究室,北京 100700
2.中国中医科学院 中医基础理论研究所,北京 100700
3.中国中医科学院,北京 100700
徐思敏,硕士,从事循证中医药方法学研究工作,E-mail:xsmin1223@163.com
唐旭东,博士,研究员,主任医师,博士生导师,从事中医脾胃理论、中西医结合消化系统疾病的基础与临床、中医临床疗效评价方法学研究,E-mail:txdly@sina.com; *
廖星,博士,研究员,从事中医药循证评价和卫生技术评估研究,E-mail:okfrom2008@hotmail.com
收稿日期:2022-04-24,
网络出版日期:2022-08-15,
纸质出版日期:2022-10-20
移动端阅览
徐思敏,戴泽琦,李苗苗等.口服中成药治疗便秘临床研究证据的概况性综述[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(20):144-153.
XU Simin,DAI Zeqi,Li Miaomiao,et al.Clinical Evidence of Treatment of Constipation with Oral Chinese Patent Medicine: A Scoping Review[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(20):144-153.
徐思敏,戴泽琦,李苗苗等.口服中成药治疗便秘临床研究证据的概况性综述[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2022,28(20):144-153. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20222093.
XU Simin,DAI Zeqi,Li Miaomiao,et al.Clinical Evidence of Treatment of Constipation with Oral Chinese Patent Medicine: A Scoping Review[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2022,28(20):144-153. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20222093.
该研究通过对已发表的治疗便秘中成药的临床研究证据进行系统全面的梳理,以期为未来该领域的临床研究及用药提供决策依据。基于概况性综述的方法,对三大药物目录中治疗便秘的中成药进行检索,获得待评价的中成药,然后基于8个中英文数据库对相关中成药治疗便秘的临床研究进行了全面系统的检索,对纳入的研究进行整合分析,结合可视化图表对结果进行展示。本研究共纳入34种中成药,118篇研究,按功效将中成药分为消积通便、泻火通便、行气通便、润肠通便4大类,涉及125味中药。便秘研究的关注度整体呈升高趋势,关注度最高的是麻仁丸(颗粒、软胶囊),发文量达42篇,随后依次是芪蓉润肠口服液21篇,便通片(胶囊)19篇,苁蓉通便口服液10篇,有17种中成药没有相应的临床研究;研究设计类型共8种,除当归龙荟丸仅有1篇病例系列研究外,各个药物均以随机对照试验为主;干预类型中中成药对比西药的干预方式最多,关注度最高的结局指标是有效率、安全性评价和主证症状或评分,缺乏统一的核心结局指标集,不良反应和经济学研究较少,仅11.86%的研究获得了资金资助。临床上中成药治疗便秘的应用较为广泛,近年来相关研究数量呈升高趋势,然而仍然还有一部分中成药缺乏相应的临床研究证据,已发表的研究在设计上存在设计不严谨,疗效评价标准不一,缺乏证据综合的研究、资金资助较少等问题。希望未来在该领域加大投入,提高对研究相对空白的药物及药物较少的便秘证型的关注度,积极开展系统综述等证据综合类研究,同时应规范研究设计,开展更多高质量的研究,为中成药治疗便秘提供可靠证据。
This study systematically and comprehensively sorted out the application status of Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of constipation in the clinic, to provide scientific evidence for future research directions and clinical drug use in this field. Based on the method of scoping review, the Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of constipation were retrieved from three drug lists to obtain the medicines that needed to be evaluated. A comprehensive and systematic search was carried out on the included studies on the treatment of constipation by Chinese patent medicines through eight Chinese and English databases, and the included studies were integrated and analyzed. The results were displayed in combination with charts. Thirty-four Chinese patent medicines and 118 studies were included in this study. According to the efficacies, Chinese patent medicines were divided into 4 categories, namely eliminating accumulation, purging fire, promoting Qi, and moistening bowels, involving 125 Chinese medicines. The overall attention of constipation research is on the rise. Marenwan (granules or soft capsules) gained the highest attention, with 42 studies, followed by Qirong Runchang oral liquid, with 21 studies, and Biantong tablets (capsules), with 19 studies. There are 10 studies on Congrong Tongbian oral liquid. Seventeen Chinese patent medicines had no corresponding clinical research. There were 8 study design types, and all drugs were mainly randomized controlled trials except Danggui Longhui pill. Among the intervention types, the comparison between Chinese patent medicines and western medicines was the most. The highest outcome indicators were efficacy, safety evaluation, and main symptoms or scores, and there was a lack of a unified core outcome indicator set. There were few studies on adverse reactions and the economy. Only 11.86% of the studies were funded. Clinically, Chinese patent medicines are widely used in the treatment of constipation, and the amount of related research shows an increasing trend. However, some Chinese patent medicines lack corresponding clinical evidence, and the published research has problems such as unrigorous design, ununified criteria for efficacy evaluation, lack of comprehensive evidence studies, and insufficient funds. It is hoped that more investment will be made in this field in the future, and more attention will be paid to drugs with relatively blank research and constipation syndromes with few treatments. Comprehensive evidence studies such as systematic reviews should be carried out actively. And the study design should be standardized to provide reliable evidence for the treatment of constipation with Chinese patent medicines.
RAO S S C , BHARUCHA A E , CHIARIONI G , et al . Anorectal disorders [J]. Gastroenterology , 2016 , 150 ( 6 ): 1430 .
MEARIN F , LACY B E , CHANG L , et al . Bowel disorders [J]. Gastroenterology , 2016 , doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031 .
中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠动力学组 , 中华医学会消化病学分会功能性胃肠病协作组 . 中国慢性便秘专家共识意见(2019,广州) [J]. 中华消化杂志 , 2019 , 39 ( 9 ): 577 - 598 .
张俊梅 . 某复合制品毒理学及通便功能评价 [D]. 兰州 : 兰州大学 , 2019 .
李延青 , 于岩波 . 功能性便秘的诊断与治疗 [J]. 中国实用内科杂志 , 2011 , 31 ( 2 ): 158 - 160 .
熊理守 , 王艺霖 , 陈旻湖 . 慢性便秘的定义和流行病学 [J]. 临床消化病杂志 , 2013 , 25 ( 4 ): 230 - 235 .
CHU H , ZHONG L , LI H , et al . Epidemiology characteristics of constipation for general population,pediatric population,and elderly population in China [J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract , 2014 , 2014 : 532734 .
张声生 , 李乾构 , 时昭红 . 慢性便秘中医诊疗共识意见 [J]. 北京中医药 , 2011 , 30 ( 1 ): 3 - 7 .
宋瑞芳 . 《内经》关于便秘的认识 [J]. 现代中医药 , 2021 , 41 ( 1 ): 106 - 110 .
刘慧 , 陈艳 , 张哲 , 等 . 中医药治疗慢性便秘研究进展 [J]. 河南中医 , 2021 , 41 ( 2 ): 320 - 324 .
张军军 , 宋瑞 . 中成药在肿瘤中的合理应用 [J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志 , 2021 , 27 ( 5 ): 775 - 777 .
林钟宇 , 张姗姗 , 戴慧明 , 等 . 麻仁软胶囊对便秘型IBS大鼠模型肠黏膜5-HT含量的影响 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂志 , 2014 , 23 ( 4 ): 343 - 346,354 .
陈勤 , 孔小卫 , 刘颖 . 一捻金胶囊泻下通便作用的实验研究 [J]. 中国中医药科技 , 2004 , 11 ( 3 ): 151 - 153 .
任晋斌 , 许卫红 , 宋玲 , 等 . 麻仁滋脾丸和益寿通通便作用研究 [J]. 中药药理与临床 , 1995 ( 4 ): 6 - 7 .
陈素云 , 林院昌 , 吕志平 , 等 . “便通胶囊”治疗老年机能性便秘 [J]. 第一军医大学学报 , 1991 ( 4 ): 339 - 341 .
TRICCO A C , LILLIE E , ZARIN W , et al . PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR):Checklist and explanation [J]. Ann Intern Med , 2018 , 169 ( 7 ): 467 - 473 .
任远勤 , 张琳 , 陈娟娟 , 等 . 苁蓉通便口服液致肝损伤 [J]. 药物不良反应杂志 , 2021 , 23 ( 1 ): 47 - 48 .
张文 , 袁海玲 , 赵静 , 等 . 苁蓉通便口服液致皮疹、眼部干涩1例 [J]. 中国现代应用药学 , 2017 , 34 ( 10 ): 1474 - 1475 .
王璞 , 王聿成 , 成磊 . 用于治疗便秘的非处方中成药不良反应文献分析 [J]. 中国药物评价 , 2013 , 30 ( 2 ): 107 - 108 .
MCGUIRE T , ROTHENBERG M B , TYLER D C . Profound shock following intervention for chronic untreated stool retention.A case report [J]. Clin Pediatr(Phila) , 1984 , 23 ( 8 ): 459 - 461 .
张梦培 , 张皓翔 , 王志恒 , 等 . 芪黄通秘软胶囊治疗功能性便秘的预算影响分析 [J]. 中南药学 , 2020 , 18 ( 10 ): 1733 - 1739 .
闫晓莹 , 李卓 , 于倩 , 等 . 三种药物治疗高龄老年人慢性功能性便秘的成本-效果分析 [J]. 中国新药与临床杂志 , 2013 , 32 ( 2 ): 154 - 157 .
乔小云 , 季洪赞 . 4种药物治疗老年功能性便秘的成本-效果比较 [J]. 医药导报 , 2008 , 27 ( 5 ): 604 - 605 .
中华中医药学会脾胃病分会 . 便秘中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017) [J]. 北京中医药 , 2017 , 36 ( 9 ): 771 - 776,784 .
史仁杰 . 脾约证及麻仁丸考析 [J]. 江苏中医药 , 2008 , 40 ( 5 ): 12 - 14 .
曹彬 , 姜卓彤 , 郜贺 , 等 . 麻子仁丸治疗便秘随机对照临床研究文献Meta分析 [J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报 , 2016 , 18 ( 8 ): 79 - 82 .
张春祥 , 廖为民 . 麻子仁丸治疗便秘Meta分析 [J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘 , 2019 , 19 ( 99 ): 22 - 24 .
YANG M , FENG Y , ZHANG Y L , et al . Herbal formula MaZiRenWan (Hemp Seed Pill) for constipation:A systematic review with Meta-analysis [J]. Phytomedicine , 2021 , 82 : 153459 .
龙芳芳 . 麻仁丸治疗化疗期便秘的疗效观察 [J]. 中华实用中西医杂志 , 2010 , 23 ( 2 ): 16 - 17 .
LEVAC D , COLQUHOUN H , O'BRIEN K K . Scoping studies:Advancing the methodology [J]. Implement Sci , 2010 , 5 : 69 .
0
浏览量
23
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621