
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所 循证医学基础研究室,北京 100700
景城阳,在读博士,从事循证评价和卫生技术评估研究,E-mail:jcydoctor7@163.com
廖星,博士,研究员,从事循证评价和决策研究,E-mail:okfrom2008@hotmail.com
收稿日期:2022-10-12,
网络出版日期:2022-12-09,
纸质出版日期:2023-03-20
移动端阅览
景城阳,吴雪,张乐等.卫生研究优先领域设置方法介绍及在中医药研究领域的应用建议[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(06):167-175.
JING Chengyang,WU Xue,ZHANG Le,et al.Introduction to Health Research Priority Setting Methods and Application Recommendations of Methods in Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(06):167-175.
景城阳,吴雪,张乐等.卫生研究优先领域设置方法介绍及在中医药研究领域的应用建议[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2023,29(06):167-175. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20230695.
JING Chengyang,WU Xue,ZHANG Le,et al.Introduction to Health Research Priority Setting Methods and Application Recommendations of Methods in Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2023,29(06):167-175. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20230695.
卫生研究优先领域设置是基于现有疾病负担或医疗需求,以科学、系统的方法筛选出研究优先级相对较高的特定领域或主题,并通过影响卫生决策来来优化卫生资源配置,从而缓解地区或全球卫生与发展不平衡的情况。许多发达国家已对此开展了不同规模的相关研究及实践工作,世界卫生组织(WHO)更是高度重视相关成果在发展中国家的转化与应用。我国作为全球最大的发展中国家,在该领域的研究起步较晚,仅有少量学者根据具体国情开展了一部分本土化方法学研究与实践工作,总体上尚未引起国内大规模的研究机构或政府组织集中关注。在中医药研究中鲜有提及优先领域者,但针对中医治疗优势病种的研究与决策亦可以视作探索中医优先(治疗)领域的实践工作。虽然决策者们已有“中医药研究优先领域”优先支持的决策意识,但来自顶层设计的决策依据主要是基于高层次智囊团来达成的共识。不仅缺少广泛的调研,也没有囊括多个利益相关方的数据,为此,亟待引入适宜的优先领域设置方法以解决这一决策过程的透明化、科学化难题。基于具体实施路径的角度详细介绍了国际主流的3种综合性优先领域设置方法——詹姆斯·林德联盟优先领域设置合作团体(JLAPSP)方法、儿童健康与营养研究倡议(CHNRI)方法、卫生研究发展委员会(COHRED)方法,并对其如何应用于中医药研究领域提出了相关建议,以资本土相关研究工作参考与借鉴。
Health research priority setting, based on the existing disease burden or healthcare needs, screens out specific areas or topics with relatively high research priority by scientific and systematic methods, and optimizes the allocation of health resources by influencing healthcare decision-making, so as to alleviate the imbalance between regional or global health and development. Many developed countries have carried out related research and practical work on different scales, and the World Health Organization (WHO) attaches great importance to the transformation and application of relevant achievements in developing countries. As the largest developing country in the world, China's research in this field started relatively late, and only a small number of scholars have carried out part of the localization methodology research and practice according to the specific national conditions. However, health research priority setting has not yet attracted the attention of large-scale research institutions or government organizations in China. Although the priority setting is rarely mentioned in the research on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the research and decision-making on the diseases responding specifically to TCM can also be regarded as the practical work of exploring the priority of TCM. Policymakers have a sense of priority support in the "priority of TCM research", but the decisions from the top design are mainly based on the consensus reached by high-level think tanks. There is a lack of extensive research, and moreover, the data of multiple stakeholders are not included. Therefore, it is urgent to introduce appropriate priority setting methods to solve the problem of transparency and scientificity in the decision-making process. Given the perspective of the specific implementation, the present study introduced three international priority setting methods, i.e., the James Lind Alliance and Priority Setting Partnerships(JLAPSP,)the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative(CHNRI), and the Council on Health Research and Development (COHRED), and presented relevant recommendations on how to apply them in the research of TCM, which is expected to provide references for the local research.
TONG A , SYNNOT A , CROWE S , et al . Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE) [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol , 2019 , 19 ( 1 ): 243 .
VIERGEVER R F , OLIFSON S , GHAFFAR A , et al . A checklist for health research priority setting:Nine common themes of good practice [J]. Health Res Policy Syst , 2010 , 8 : 36 .
CHALMERS I , BRACKEN M B , DJULBEGOVIC B , et al . How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set [J]. Lancet , 2014 , 383 ( 9912 ): 156 - 165 .
TERRY R F , CHARLES E , PURDY B , et al . An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization - How mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches [J]. Health Res Policy Syst , 2018 , 16 ( 1 ): 116 .
SABIK L M , LIE R K . Priority setting in health care:Lessons from the experiences of eight countries [J]. Int J Equity Health , 2008 , 7 : 4 .
RALAIDOVY A H , LAUER J A , PRETORIUS C , et al . Priority setting in HIV,tuberculosis,and malaria - New cost-effectiveness results from WHO-CHOICE [J]. Int J Health Policy Manag , 2021 , 10 ( 11 ): 678 - 696 .
李雪 , 赵琨 , 齐雪然 , 等 . 西部基层妇幼卫生服务提供体系优先研究问题确定——基于CHNRI方法 [J]. 中国卫生事业管理 , 2014 , 31 ( 4 ): 244 - 247 .
峗怡 . 卫生资源优先次序分配的政府治理研究——国际研究述评及对我国的启示 [J]. 中国卫生政策研究 , 2014 ( 11 ): 24 - 29 .
峗怡 . 卫生资源配置决策的非正式制度的影响研究——基于对隐性优先分配规则的思考 [J]. 中国行政管理 , 2019 ( 3 ): 99 - 103 .
钟晓妮 , 周燕荣 , 易静 . 主成分法在优先解决卫生问题次序中的应用研究 [J]. 中国卫生经济 , 2003 , 22 ( 7 ): 39 - 40 .
桑海云 , 高琦 , 姜宝法 . 卫生政策研究中优先问题确立的循证模式 [J]. 中国卫生事业管理 , 2008 , 25 ( 8 ): 508 - 510 .
杨思红 , 赵晖 , 梁宁 , 等 . 中医优势病种遴选和评价技术指导建议 [J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志 , 2022 , 28 ( 10 ): 1595 - 1601 .
中华中医药学会 . 2022年度中医药重大科学问题、工程技术难题及产业技术问题 [J]. 中医杂志 , 2022 , 63 ( 14 ): 1301 - 1312 .
YOSHIDA S . Approaches,tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21 st century [J]. J Glob Health , 2016 , 6 ( 1 ): 010507 .
HOLLIS C , SAMPSON S , SIMONS L , et al . Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care:Results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership [J]. Lancet Psychiatry , 2018 , 5 ( 10 ): 845 - 854 .
HART A L , LOMER M , VERJEE A , et al . What are the top 10 research questions in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease? A priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance [J]. J Crohns Colitis , 2017 , 11 ( 2 ): 204 - 211 .
KELLY S , LAFORTUNE L , HART N , et al . Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance:Using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda [J]. Age Ageing , 2015 , 44 ( 6 ): 985 - 993 .
BATCHELOR J M , RIDD M J , CLARKE T , et al . The eczema priority setting partnership:A collaboration between patients,carers,clinicians and researchers to identify and prioritize important research questions for the treatment of eczema [J]. Br J Dermatol , 2013 , 168 ( 3 ): 577 - 582 .
NYGAARD A , HALVORSRUD L , LINNERUD S , et al . The James Lind Alliance process approach:Scoping review [J]. BMJ Open , 2019 , 9 ( 8 ): e027473 .
FRISON S , ANGOOD C , KHARA T , et al . Prevention of child wasting:Results of a Child Health & Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) prioritisation exercise [J]. PLoS One , 2020 , 15 ( 2 ): e0228151 .
TOMLINSON M , DARMSTADT G L , YOUSAFZAI A K , et al . Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era:A CHNRI exercise [J]. J Glob Health , 2019 , 9 ( 3 ): 020703 .
IRVINE C , ARMSTRONG A , NAGATA J M , et al . Setting global research priorities in pediatric and adolescent HIV using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology [J]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr , 2018 , 78 ( Suppl 1 ): S3 - S9 .
ARORA N K , MOHAPATRA A , GOPALAN H S , et al . Setting research priorities for maternal,newborn,child health and nutrition in India by engaging experts from 256 indigenous institutions contributing over 4 000 research ideas:A CHNRI exercise by ICMR and INCLEN [J]. J Glob Health , 2017 , 7 ( 1 ): 011003 .
WAZNY K , SADRUDDIN S , ZIPURSKY A , et al . Setting global research priorities for integrated community case management (iCCM):Results from a CHNRI (Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative) exercise [J]. J Glob Health , 2014 , 4 ( 2 ): 020413 .
RUDAN I , GIBSON J L , AMERATUNGA S , et al . Setting priorities in global child health research investments:Guidelines for implementation of CHNRI method [J]. Croat Med J , 2008 , 49 ( 6 ): 720 - 733 .
杨梦楠 , 赵琨 , 齐雪然 , 等 . 利用CHNRI方法确定中国卫生政策优先研究问题 [J]. 中国卫生政策研究 , 2015 , 8 ( 1 ): 74 - 79 .
MONTORZI G , HAAN S , IJSSELMUIDEN C . Priority setting for research for health:A management process for countries [M]. Geneva : Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) , 2010 .
胡善联 . 循证卫生决策研究方法介绍 [J]. 中国循证医学杂志 , 2007 , 7 ( 2 ): 142 - 146 .
NASSER M , WELCH V , TUGWELL P , et al . Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews:Evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews [J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 2013 , 66 ( 5 ): 474 - 482 .
SIBBALD S L , SINGER P A , UPSHUR R , et al . Priority setting:What constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting [J]. BMC Health Serv Res , 2009 , 9 : 43 .
张晓雨 , 邱瑞瑾 , 李承羽 , 等 . 中医临床研究优先领域/主题设置思路与方法 [J]. 中国循证医学杂志 , 2019 , 19 ( 3 ): 373 - 376 .
0
浏览量
34
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621